November 2021
« Feb    
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 11:54 am

MOST RECENT COLUMN CAN NOW BE FOUND AT: http://hogan.jphogan.org

COLUMNS CAN THOUGH STILL BE FOUND VIA: http://citizenrosebud.org



http://jphogan.org   or bust -

ye subjects of America.


Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 9:30 pm

A disrobing of the President is about - per his “Let me be clear(s)” - and his Lew’s demonstrative postulating considerable regarding “The President’s ‘PRINCIPLES’” as if a sufficient end-all of all be-alls:  It seems our current President has a lot of religiousity to specifically answer of and for - it seems as our President disrobes it should take a while as a robe for each of all faiths co-existent now with-in America and the rest of the world as we know are of his high claims and braggadocio unique to his “personality.”

We should expect he is ready to be before our highest of Justices ready to “prioritize” with his expectable pontification with a professional thoroughness respectful for each faith’s “robe” he claims to be fit to wear.  We should expect he and all of his of Obamacare are ready to thoroughly “disrobe” - to peal away all applicable sensitivities and nuances due full respect and freedoms under our separations of the naked beauty of their attempt (over-reaching?) to a new “body politic” for the United States of America.

How will President Barack Hussein Obama who wanted, so wanted, to be easy in office of just a “personality based presidency” now show all the “robes” of all his already existent past claims and properly “prioritized” to be respectful of all faiths he claims no abridging or infringing of contrary establishment.  I think I have actually had his number since I was maybe in 7th grade - but left him more for my older sisters politeness and Christian benevolence, as I remember it wasn’t fair that a question about whether I was ready for schools oratory contest with President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “DAY OF INFAMY” speech as if I had to give it in Hawaii instead had someone four years older from Hawaii, it seemed, the only challenger, taking the spirited call. It is easier to understand my political relationship with my sister if you think I have disagreed with her politics and political skill more than agreed, yet start at 50-50.  It is hard to forget when a serious moment like readiness to publicly orate a declaration of war becomes a “B.O.” childish whimsy between pal questioner and myself both a wondering if we would even think we should run for president if our initials also were abbreviation for “body odor.”

I was just remembering Gloria Steinem for having been a reviewer on Judith Herman M.D. then brand new book “TRAUMA AND RECOVERY” - and this fits with my sisters varying degrees of designed separation much within and of years of my entertaining and very political musing.  I grew up with older sisters much in our 70s and 80s and around so many “new” ways being tried piecework by piecework obviously for a new feminism but not one already figured out.  For those of you joining my regular reader with this piece as near your first - I know I have known Bill and Hillary since I was in first grade, and for a bad first impression they left that left me aware and considerate that it may be best never to forget them.  I must have taken out of my K-4 Worthington Hooker School Library (converted classroom with books) one of two or three copies of “MEET GEORGE WASHINGTON” at least near 20 times in those years there.  I don’t know if I thought it an antidote to the bad impression the Clintons left - but I cannot now say that is not why I was so often returning to a book about George Washington.

I do not know how a former Constitutional Law Professor can let any underling do the disrobing of his defensiveness of Obamacare for our highest review while it is his own claims that have been called out seriously regarding he and his “principles” as per Un-Constitutionality.  As per my seventh grade oratorical performance I did take second place that year - and may have agreed with first place thought that I didn’t want to take a declaration of war city wide, or initiated and stood with that thought by myself - I may have been willingly psyched out by one speaking flowery and romantically, and even in an African American verse which with she was naturally more familiar and strong.

We have a history of Nixon tripped up by what became a too secular and political partisan socializing than nearly turned our national ratings all to XXX as with Mark Felt dramatization as “Deep Throat.”  We have a new President embroiled also in a fog of separations and foresworn rights.  We have that President Obama has implied and/or asserted that he is of a personality able to bring the peace and understanding as per all regards of our otherwise Constitutional writs and recently with his Chief of Staff specifically pontificating of an existent “Obama Principles” - we have heard now of the French Revolution and anew references to guillotines - we have as well with all the supposed “robes” to be peeled away with a careful, and respectful prioritization that President Obama isn’t to be crucified or knocked onto wood, so.

If you are like me now about all this you likely have more questions than answers - and really - knock on wood - there seem to be so many “establishments” to hear out and especially with an anticipation fairly to be expectable specifically from President Barack Hussein Obama, our 44th President.  We do have that our “Deep Throat” historical did blur the lines of separations and individual uniquenesses betwixt and between each and all and each and State - that as we near XXX rating cross-religious realms fogged up.

Happy Presidents Day - I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t now want to be in this President’s “robes” - not this month, not next month, not likely at all for 2012.


                               XX   XXX  XXXX  XXX   XX

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 11:35 am
HAM = #SMW12 - Thank you all that decided @jphoganorg had the most interesting tweets and post of 2012 Social Media Week
STOCKS = #SMW12 Healthcare reform issue gets interesting when “jury” in
“injury” reminds us our is of and from frontier justice - but old law
and practice such that our Bill of Rights interestingly foreswears
America from having National Healthcare - as the ten rights give Power
to cause injury in protection of person and property that our National
Government best leave alone to penance, penitence, and forgiveness if
not the blocks for public shame for chicken thiefs.
PORK = #smw12 - other dark meat of politics to entitlements partisan to “re-election” more than “governance.”
= #smw12 - What some politicians still haven’t been able to
realisitically find for the rising (costs) they promised when promising
their spending as smart and intelligent and even actually possible.
= #smw12 - hope you all enjoyed learning of my involvement and length
of creative involvement - If I posted another old poem of mine from
efforts to global positive change and IBM and Politics from my THE
CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM I might put up the one harkening as Da Vinci
code in poetry - my: DRUMS ROLL. For I believe it is from the sharing
of that one from 1991 or92 that had a Dan Brown in my head asking for
the part of a stanza or two spirit that was in such but that I didn’t
want to develop. I had been about helping Eli Whitney Museum then
design and build an exhibit on Leonardo when I wrote such to close my
TCONF - Hmmm? Hadn’t abbreviated it before - interesting as “TCONF.”
= #SMW12 - What Clintons shouldn’t have had so much of during 90s when
wanting to have it too. What we are thankful for still and much now
because the world didn’t end - the world didn’t end by fire in 1992.

STOCKS = #SMW12 Healthcare reform issue gets interesting when “jury” in
“injury” reminds us our is of and from frontier justice - but old law
and practice such that our Bill of Rights interestingly foreswears
America from having National Healthcare - as the ten rights give Power
to cause injury in protection of person and property that our National
Government best leave alone to pennance, penitence, and forgiveness if
not the blocks for public shame for chicken thiefs.

= #SMW12 - I was going to make “GRAVY” yet thankful but remembering
that our 90s were a great mess and not yet the foretold more complex and
heavy mess it looks like it could have been. Thankful like when of
gravy but grateful we still have our bacon. Don’t know why when
Clintons’ got served what they did they ate and ate and ate so that now
we still may have statistic that if Americans could get back to their
pre-Clintons average weight our nation should be to saving a trillion
dollars in healthcare costs. “PEACE” wasn’t on their platter - and yet
all they shilled was PEACE DIVIDENDS - Go figure?

[To consider how thankful I am that some, even most, of artists that benefited from my creative - strategic and direct musing for so many year - It helps to know that when Hillary Clinton announced “Hillary for President” I put out the word that near none of them were supposed to believe or interpret that any of such past collaboration and sharing should or could be interpreted as meant to help her and Bill with such.  I may not be thankful that most may have forgotten or ignored a consideration to if their common muse was actually being kept with any normal motivation towards such so generous - but I am still thankful that letters emailed to Kelly Bush as Natalie Portman’s Public Relations Professional (And Stan Rosenfield - If I am this morning remembering correctly without double checking) seem to have gotten such word out that nothing I did was supposed to now be used at all to help the Clintons, and that I owned most of such S**T - not them.  There were some efforts I considered exempt from such cease and desist that pre-date David Geffen and that half of Clintons’ “friend” that walked away very publicly and politically from them.  I might have been willing to help Barack Obama once elected - but not after he embraced the Clintons - and kept them embraced past the first year he should have used to try to clean up his own party and politics.]

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 11:03 am


Filed under:MYBLOG - 5/26/2011
{Format oddity is from “copy” - “paste” — It is not here
 as purposeful, just as too much to bother re-justifying.}

How fitting and
mad, just mad, that legend of Amabo the anti-Declaration of
Independence, did either stand proud, and diminutivish, with the Crown,
or did stand, as a conquering neo-colonialist so with first speach for
such on high as Americans support, so with his Westminster Hall
appearance likely still too much of his apology and apeasement tours.

Was it all such too much for HARPO Productions to cover with Oprah Show?

How mad, just mad.  How now even a “Madness of King Amabo”?

Was it grand colonial power envy that has long
known neo-colonialist Amabo seeking such a stage — was it something less
sinister and socialist - a modern “hybrid” much ensconced in a mad made

First we had the madness that was of the lead
up to 2008 elections of the Pelosi Congress suggesting President Bush
should be able to fix economy by staying true to spending side of
Clintons’ SURPLUS, and Pelosi’s personal rabidness about such irrational
party pride.

So now we have a generally corrupt media with
the reported “most corrupt administration in American history” (like -
like maybe from Rep. Issa).  There is so much they could have shared to
better inform all - there is so many truths they could have broadcast to
help more focus on relevant variables.

So now with such “MADNESS OF KING AMABO” it is a wonder if it isn’t really AMABO PRODUCTIONS setting us up for MESSIAH III.

NOTE:  If you are from my past and my origins
in New Haven I may have a general disappointment in you as a
“class”/lumped together group – Democrats weren’t supposed to get or
keep credit for so much that was me trying to be bi-partisan to
right-of-center and such that my story and of “Citizen Rosebud” as a
specifically Hearst Publications story also maybe too much for Oprah or
Harpo.  I find a disinterest just think of cycling towards New Haven
these days for so many years that so many could have helped protect me
from further mugging of my intellectual property by the Clintons and the
even more unwelcomed collateral crediting to my sister by you and my
father of so much that was really specifically and very cleverly and
covertly me.  I really have a near unshakeable disappointment in so many
I have known for so long - and largely specifically because of
“political” lack of skill of Clintons.  2010 was 1994 all over again at
least as of the years I held back, now with my being on strike since day
“Hillary for President” announcement, and let my Dad and sister’s input
be straight party line and party pride in more simply partisan in
Democrat limits.  Yes Capital One I am still very disappointed in your
banking practices and mean to make an example of you in future blogs
- Sears and Chrysler I must say you have departmental issues as it seems
you of a ‘cluelessness’ about me who made you many millions over with
intellectual contributions really not by or of the Clintons - and
certainly not of “inspired” by the Clintons since most of what I
contributed was often “damage control” needed because of the Clintons. 
So my strike continues - how to reaffirm it now my current problema. 
Again, I am of earlier remarks where President Obama would lose all my
confidence if he failed to clean up his own party by moving out the
Clintons to near an irrelevancy within his first year.  Oh, yeh, I can
bike towards Bridgeport instead - you know “The Park City” - a city with
which I have less historical disappointment.  I know some of this was
because I got trapped in my own cleverness about spin to help my dad
help my sister and her career without it being detectable as the
unacceptable as “help from her brother” but that only needed a few to
right back when checking the Clintons’ dementing efforts to turn more to
mere like “muggles” with their “big lies” furthered or enhanced to
further make simple logic seem untrue and irrational. 


Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 1:15 am

Did you hear the one about the Supreme Court?

I mean we are of a day when it seems that the world Democrat legal “experts” are living in doesn’t really exist.  I am now seated listening some to Akhil Amar, a Constitutional Law Professor of Yale Law School, and other members of a panel on healthcare oral argument preview replaying now on CSPAN. 

We have a new world order,  much of these arguments went out with the fall of the Berlin Wall.

There is no basis for Professor Amar’s claim that state now are incapable of fixing or sufficiently policing his “spill-over” constructs.  It is an argument that was of the pre Jobian Tablets decades when Senator Ted Kennedy might have been justified himself with such.  There are many other ways to address such concern now and experts that could move laterally from comstats for community policing to a new web based community county wide system using technology to police his spill-over.

What got me back to social media tonight after some livestreaming of healthcare debates also today but as part of Social Media Week was some absurd “commerce” or other attempt to justify Obamacare as written. 

We have a new world order,  dangerously now a bio-threat may be more real since Obama inauguration, but that is not a good reason to say his failures in world wide diplomacy, justify a mandate due to a new greater threat.

It is hard to see where the world some of these Democrat defenders of Obamacare over-reaching actually exists.  I may have had more issue with Neal Katyal’s legal constructs and as well for seeming removed in time and place from defense of our Constitutional purpose and especially import of our Bill of Rights.

I don’t know about you all but I did grow up in a neighborhood with a Christian Science Monitor (?) place of worship and all the neighborhood polite whispers to guide concerned that such was a house of worship that didn’t believe in medical interverence or interruption in their existence and their beliefs.  This was my New Haven of my youth - such building is in new hands and has been built out and enhanced into a state of the art new New Haven Public School - a new Hooker School.  Representative Rosa DeLauro knows it well - she must - she has lived a block away for decades.  For me it was a neighborhood parking lot that could be a play ground and with a wall good at times as a tennis backboard.

Professor Amar misses that we are in a new world order - a different State order since the days Senator Kennedy started on such path.  We have now that keeping radical changes attempted by Democrats to our otherwise “general Welfare” ambling ways may put at more at risk as a nation not less at risk.  He can mention bio-threats as causal for mandate as if forcing citizens to possess guns but if the act of establishing such a Constitutional variation from our norms makes us that of a greater danger we should pause and wonder.

The changes they are arguing for in defense of Obama’s over-reaching are a fundamental Constitutional shift and a pre-emption from a mass of other alternatives at least available to fight or stem burden risk of “spill-over” mentioned already.  We haven’t ever at least tried to deal with “spill-over” as we did the once over centralized and near bunker mentality that had become our policing standard pre 1990s.  We now only have more options and many that could use mass of Jobian Tablets currently available as well as medical bracelets with computer memory to otherwise make record as portable as “need” suggested some by Obamacare.

I heard a lot about “limiting principles” and yet Obamacare defenders seemed to suggest that recent remarks by Chief of Staff Lew as of “Obama’s principles” weren’t admissible for their positions - that “principles” so mentioned by Lew would muck up their assertions of “limiting principles” since Lew’s comments force flush theirs for both offer a relevance of “principles” and in a contrariness.  There cannot really be a place where their defense that “principles” aren’t needed or relevant and where Obama is asserted to have the “Principles” established that defend such.

When the United States of America became a sole superpower we became of a different necessary Constitutional interpretation about federalism and state(s) versus State rights.  We became of a time where we should become safer globally by becoming renewed to a more original regionalism.  That said, still if defenders of Obamacare cannot argue how a county wide reformed system could work then they shouldn’t be able to assert that they have an argument of understanding for a centralization starting instead much too far away or maybe above county wide to country wide.  We have that you can say it needs a national fix and yet not be saying truthfully that a nationalized fix with centralization is needed.

I don’t know where in the known world these Democrat Obamacare legal “experts” actually exists.  We have that our Bill of Rights give all citizens the right to protect themselves and their property with ten that preserve them a Right to thwart those against them acting against the Ten Commandments.  Our Bill of Rights preserve the Power of citizens to protect themselves from others braking faith with the Ten Commandments.  As per healthcare reform it cannot be like requiring a citizen to possess a weapon for it is more like requiring them to refrain from a defense with them, and as a domestic threat.  We don’t have to be believers of a church where their faith prohibits medical care to see that some hold in their faith that some illness comes from crossing barriers of society or community around establish sins.

It is extraordinary for sure that Obamacare may actually change our American ways Constitutional so much that it could set us to a higher national risk level to the very type of attacks it wants to defend us from.  We have that they attempted to start at the top with a grand ideological centralizing when the problems they claim make it necessary actually now still are a new frontier of possibilities to enhance not strangle our reputation and freedom.  We have that Obamacare healthcare reforms have yet hardly had an alternative of many now possible and plausible even tried yet in New York State - even attempted by NY to compete with MASS.  We have all of the Clintons’ 8 and then their New York Senate power projection days all to wonder on - all as evidence that goal must have been to avoid finding local and community more county based alternatives.

Before the new world order came in with America standing as a sole superpower we had State over state(s) in ways that since have not necessarily been wise or economically prudent or attractive.  We have that Obamacare may be of an economic suppression actually causal partly to our down economy.  We have that they are too many commercial and county or state based possibilities that haven’t been attempted yet, though now plausible with internet age.  We have that “spill-over” is where we should start - that we have at least county based problems effecting costs that are not impossible and insurmountable and so justifying of a new nationalism.

How can this be allowable under our Commerce clause if it ideologically asks for a bias that depends on us not looking at all the commercial alternatives actually still available, and at least before a permanent change made to our Constitutional foundation here to fore up held within our national security conditions and priorities? 

I don’t know how Clintons’ New York hasn’t yet offered a regional alternative - to have avoided such still only adds to a foreign perspective of America that if the National government rushes to over-take their states with such over-reaching it must as well therefor think it should be dictating to their sovereign states as well, where ever.  Only by embracing that this era allows us near a renaissance in regionalism within current Constitutional interpretation can we show the world that we aren’t all thinking our Washington based “New Nationalism” isn’t meant to be an “imperialism.”

The new world order with us left standing as a sole superpower suggested we would be safer and better to be ourselves more, with a renewed regionalism to show that we still weren’t an imperial nation by design - weren’t a neo-colonialist conglomerate egomaniacal soulless mass looking to spread a forced assimilation, still.

And as I considered much of this just the same in early 90s and around days of IBM struggling with PC marketing now I do for Jobian Tablets again with same commerce concerns that Democrats have to be checked from their hopes that such computer hook-up are better towards assimilation than a renewal or renaissance in originality and free expression.

We have an economy of the Democrats now - we have that Republicans seemed to accept that the best defense was to let the Democrats defeat themselves - to let them have their unreal vacuum and see if such wouldn’t actually just fail and fail as of their pure design - their worked out applications of their ideological bias.

We have the Chief of Staff Lew implied President Obama already has “Principles” that can explain all of this and even so to cover all “limiting principles” restraints.

I don’t - I don’t know that the world Democrats seem to be living in actually exists anywhere, anywhere in the world as we know it.  I do know that Obamacare attempts to prevent and preclude so many commercial alternative still possible and plausible and yet still not yet attempted and yet still being discussed by Americans interested in national resolving without such being nationalized option.

The grandest fallacy heard by Yale Constitutional Law Professor Amar regarding his “spill-over” justification is that Obamacare was passed before we solved our national border and immigration big issues, and so isn’t actually offering to prevent “spill-over” just move it more grandly with out sufficient forethought to a new big national issue, with healthcare reform a great big carrot now to encourage and attract more illegal spilling across our borders. 

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 1:42 pm


Can you see visions of Fascist originalist Benito Mussolini in his last moments?

From Benito Mussolini Wiki page:  “After being shot, kicked, and spat upon, the bodies were hung upside down on meathooks from the roof of an Esso gas station.”

And there once were a whole lot of Liberty Ships made in Bridgeport Connecticut — I don’t know where the one Christened the Joseph V. Connolly un-dry docked from originally.   I did spend some summers on Block Island in a humble “President’s Room” of a quaint bed and breakfast run by Joseph V. Connolly Jr and his bride Violette Connolly, of Dutch descent like Adrian Block.  I did help Mr. and Mrs. Connolly, as a college student summering in the Town of New Shoreham, with some of their modifications when founding their THE WHITE HOUSE B&B.  As part of this I spent many nights sleeping under an autographed photo of Benito Mussolini to Connolly Sr. and as well a picture of the Naval vessel Joseph V. Connolly (Sr.).

And when one may here of “tools” and the 1992 Presidency contestations it may help to think of more than one Stanley.

As I recall and attempt to self curate with social media or “new media” it is that I recall first meeting Joseph V. Connolly Jr. before realizing his father was in the first graduating class of 1906 of the New Haven Public School Worthington Hooker School that I had attended as then a K-4 and not as originally a K-12.  See it was on a visit of my parents while I so summer situated that my dad opened up a picture book about Joe’s dad and saw him standing with his class in 1906 on the steps of such school directly across the street from our home.  Joe used to write a column for the Block Island Times - I think it was called “Comments from a Cottager” - that could have been someone else’s, I haven’t checked in a long time.  I forget the when where or how that Joe was an upper classmen to the more famous Russell Baker and possibly as an older fraternity brother.

Yeh, like, I know, if “SUMMITEERS” didn’t have a plural “S” it would seem more to be a referencing of Moses and/or Jewish leadership, and maybe less poetic or non-obviously inclusive of and to now President of Yale Richard C. Levin - First Jewish President of Yale and former Dean of Economics - and near earliest of my clients as a Connecticut S-Corp known so by my neighbors.

And yet for all the Hearst history already wired with mentioning of late Joseph V. Connolly Sr. and Joseph V. Connolly Jr. I do remember that though a matter of weeks about 1983 that it seems my awareness and connection to Sarah Heath Palin did precede my quite interesting connections to Anne and Patty Hearst.  I seem to have to rely on thinking first of wondering if there was another Sarah Heath that I should become aware of if I did use the photography and dark room skills learned earlier from my neighbor and elective teacher when in Middle School professionally after being my Governors Yearbook Photographer with another that incidentally did go on to race or drive some dogs sled herself.  I seem to think that I caught an airing of CITIZEN KANE after first to such thoughts and then to family linking for of ambitiousness maybe to becoming a media mogul myself.

When it comes to Stanleys not “TOOLS” it is still somewhat poetic that because renowned Pollster Stanley Greenberg was also a neighbor and parent of friends of my circles around swim team and youth group I might knowingly have balanced my knowing Sarah Heath of Alaska as Republican and jested at times using “Title IX” tags to build a broader republican strategic net around my personal beliefs while around a Stanley not of the Stanley tools and shared interests from my maternal grandfather Arthur M. Menadier - retired 1971 from Young and Rubicam after nearly 25 years running much or all of then Johnson & Johnson Marketing and Advertising business.  I do remember I used to refresh my sister as regards my “Title IX” interests on almost all my DC visits when she was working then for Senator Christopher Dodd - this may be the first chance she has to finally understand what I was wiring, hard to say.

I did grow up to be a J Peter man, it seems, and from days - even tennis team days with two older sisters in a time of feminist movements and general liberalism where maybe more so - where “lanky” Kramers a necessary consideration to any or all my strategizing around my personal beliefs and media ambitions - each of my sisters had a lanky Kramer brother in their class or groups.

I have already recently mentioned another Hearst long of interest - and boy was she at first a real political concern.  When I first noticed her on TV in a show with Julia Louis-Dreyfus, a special documentary broadcast - I didn’t know where or how she fit in a broad Hearst Corporate or family tree.  I count myself as lucky now that she did turn out to be Anne’s daughter - but I was a while in figuring out who she was so - and now better understand only some of what seems to be her power over me.  When I found her on social media via myspace and we became publicly friends, and she then so one of my five with Leonardo De Caprio, Bar Refaeli, Petra Nemcova & Tom Andersen I was still much unrefreshed on much of the above.  I was still thinking about moving to Los Angeles and maybe even managing a figure skater who helped me keep a drug free sports message about my then thought fully redirected ambitions - accommodations made thinking Clintons had unknowingly destroyed most of my original plans - I may have still been sharing poetry and thoughts with Petra Nemcova on her now former site.  Because I did so much to direct a way for snowboard sport and so much else for positive change I was heavy to keeping a drug free message for at least Americans.

This should be enough sharing and use of social media/new media for today but for the hours more I expect to catch “livestreams” from Social Media Week. 

Really, my Hearst personal connection do trump my Hearst Corp ambitions, and I had no idea who Amanda was when we first connected because she was on a show that Julia Louis Dreyfus was also highlighted, then again, on.

And, well you have heard of J.K. Rowling, right?  Well the confidence I gave her was from a known focus worked without collaboration otherwise to be to stories that I thought would peak and hold maternal interests and publishing interests of both Anne and Patty Hearst.  And, that was some type of secret I was trying to keep until books were all complete - boy did she complicate my life not using only the five years I thought the challenge to seven books could or should take her.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 6:25 pm



















                                                                               J.P. HOGAN
                                                                                  JULY 11, 1992

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 9:05 am

Waiting for President Barack to work his messianic further now may be as fruitful as if our waiting for him to release his college papers were as if we were still waiting for books of John or Matthew or Luke.

We should expect nothing less now than an Obama “Bible” as a Book of Barack, or just a book of a “Book of Barack.”

He has waded rudely into bridging long historical for community and global morals, he has fired off crass remarks suggestive that early Declarations not at all as he would have then or would now have written them, if he could have written them.  We have still to wait, and wait, and specifically especially for his early works when more a disciple of Harvard and Columbia.

President Nixon is proving to have been more prudent and diligent when of dramatized “If a President says it is legal then it is legal” far more than President Obama could rightly suggest or publish truthfully if to parables of a Book of Barack necessarily of these recent years of 1st Amendment over speak still not supported with his or our written texts.  He, President Obama, has been recorded saying near:  “I didn’t know that I wouldn’t be able to dictate on these matters once President.”  Hmmm?  He has been long as President, tortuously long, economically speaking, for of “supply” social spending hardly related to “economic science.”  He has walked and talked as if people should fall before him as disciples even in economics though he more than Nixon of the negative side of “If a President says it is legal then it is legal” supposing.

If President Barack Hussein Obama who wanted to be of a “Personality Based Presidency” where his “story” was not his “training” was not necessarily his study or actual work experience - then surely as our Supreme Court readies to hear the Un-Constitutional push back from many non-Obama Statists statists more themselves, they and we will expect some actual “principles” from President Barack Hussein Obama.  It does seem impossible that Obamacare can actually lower costs as it claims - yet there are the “principles” that should be of Obama’s new foundation for healthcare that are to be expected and as legal and admissible.

I have already pondered that like our Declaration of Independence President Obama has been disregarding at least the Bible and institutions so otherwise based.  I have already suggested “Bible” was taken so a book by President could be “Trible” or “Ible” but really we have that he is suppressing faith and offering pill based morals.  So, it seems a book, a “Book of Barack” could be titled “Drible” for “Dr Ible” a way of Obama (Barack) by chemically altered states, legal and illegal.

The other day while at a Social Media Week event with Jermaine Dupri I did realize I am taller than he is, physically.  He may be taller than the President spiritually - he announced something about a “G-BOX” for his Global14 web/communities.  The President is taller than I am - by inches, and yet has my same birthday but from four years earlier.  Did you know Jermaine Dupri likes “Blondie”?  I saw him get all posie near a strip.

A “DRIBLE” by and of “BOOK OF BARACK” to explain his past anti-Independence statements and his efforts of dictates to Congress suggesting they should make laws establishing his sense of “religions” should also really deal with “drugs” and dependence on “entitlements” and/or “chemicals - recreational or self medicatory.  Such now would need hymns and chapters on his capology of seamless rubbers and any “principles” he might have to explain why and/or how such can be “free” - economically speaking to his belief system(s).

I did meet Jermaine Dupri enough while at Hearst Tower on 8th near Columbus Circle - I do wonder if he appreciates it as well for maybe being the most socially conscious and phallic architecture in building for anywhere currently in New York City.  Around its base is its history and legacy with eggs cradled with care for the ages above its original six, from within such rises straight up and proud a spire wrapped and structured most obviously in diamonds but as well of a consciousness in triangles.  It looks well ribbed and uniformly covered, and with Monks or maybe Jesuits or other Brothers less than gargoyles standing pensive near or next to feminine concerns similarly there drafted and carved for New York minutes and daily blank pages of all ages.  I have not studied architecture - I have read some but not studied any where near a majority of even a minority of Manhattan’s architecture.  Hearst Tower may be so new that it is still “green” and “greenest” new building - its ribbing is deserved and appropriate for all “green” concerns and global or local consciousness using acceptable natural inspiration and yet about 25% less carbon based steel.

It does look like if it were stepped on by a giant it would pop right back up - Hearst Tower, that is.  I may prefer to work in new Tower One at Ground Zero some day and so that I could daily be reminded of what a mess our 90s actually were.  A re-election of Barack Hussein Obama without a “BOOK OF BARACK” or a sufficient basis for his “DRIBLE” has me now already on issue so with such if not just from an apparent lesser of two evils erudite and measured and check democratic foundation and as so about such as an issue of our today with concerns for what it might say bad about too many Americans.

It is still a ridiculous American condition that the pre-existing legacy of the Clintons and their “two-fer” First Coupling hasn’t had citizen people of these United States of America and global spectators being wise, prudent, and/or consciously cautious in our Post Clinton Presidency - Post 9/11 years of learned lessons and a guarded deciding.  It is ridiculous already that a Clinton can be any how now a part of any post 9/11 administration, conservatively speaking to basic street sense and “live and learn” pragmatism.  A re-election of President Obama is nearing as bad a “ridiculous” and “dangerous” that would speak poorly of “American” common sense and so as if it has all been lost - that American “common sense” has been lost. 

We have “innocent until proven guilty” (now less globally and locally thanks to both Clintons?) and we have our 90s to look back on daily with guarded concern.  We have these truths already self evident in public realms and yet not accepted as politically relevant.  We have indivisible that the Clintons acted politically as a “two-fer” Washington power couple and shared, and shared, and shared.  We have the Church taking issues with them while taking issue now with dictates from President Obama & Book of Barack (or “DRIBLE”) still unpublished. 

The three seem inseparable. 

Without DRIBLE or at least a BOOK OF BARACK we will be left to be of a blind faith in President Obama and still the Clintons by association - a re-election of President Obama may be more concerning for what it would or might say about those that voted for him/for them. 

We have still that by November 2012 we may have to take sides and yet still below our best standards and high holy hopes for America as conceived and subscribed whence - we have President Obama has positioned himself as anti-Independence and, now at least it looks like Republicans are of establishments historical hopeful and honestly already superior than a fate for US anew of “lesser of the two evils” as if already in shades of “evil” more than hopeful shades of “good”.

We have it as a possibility and existent that “OBAMACARE” may find its “Un-Constitutional” basis soon measured and judged by nine to a no by nine as citizen people and their experts are stomping it daily with a rap and beat down for failing publicly already on 1st Amendment turf.  We have it now exposed of dribble for a DRIBLE of at least a BOOK OF BARACK necessary to an explainin’ as it seems to be becoming common sense and measured to side with parties of and for steppin’ tuned to an appreciation that OBAMACARE just doesn’t look like it can or will reduce healthcare costs.

Somehow this is kept from being racist.  I don’t know that President Obama can do the same with a due “DRIBLE” at least.  He isn’t the “New York Minutes” he hoped to be - hoped to be while contrary in his ways.  We could use a BOOK OF BARACK now, it seems necessary at least for his defense against the “Un-Constitutional” review soon of SCOTUS bar.


Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 11:40 am

Ok guys, please today remember to put down your Bemis or American Standard your Westport or Church or maybe your Eljer or TOTO or Koehler toilet seat, and if you made a mess on its covering please remove and start the wash.  I understand you might have a Fisher-Price cover or another brand and rightly so depending on how many special valentines share your throne(s).

Part of my New Haven Public Schooling story is of middle school curriculum of those years required to study Home Economics and with sewing and cooking as well as real math obviously not much of Obama’s example being set relative to Race to the Top. 

“A stitch in time can save nine.”  I didn’t stop working on threads whence such was balanced with time in Industrial Arts and school’s woodshop.  I did tend if to sewing though more to heavy thread and awls and leather, of some further practical applications learned from camp in Massachusetts at Becket - a YMCA in the Berkshires.  I did learn canoeing and sailing their so really appreciate how important stitching can be (for sailors).  When in past dozen or so years I took to restoring vessels for myself and to the sail covers and boat cushion covers - I did set about such as a challenge for myself - I have since sold the sewing machine I bought for such while in DC on Capitol Hill near Eastern Market - while out side with small yard sales convenient as social weekend reading times.  Sewing isn’t my forte - I did consider “liquid courage” a necessity for each new boat cushion cover to adorn the 1968 Cal 25 I was restoring to as near “like new” as I could.  I did sell this boat but not from yard sale so as above mentioned and so that I could afford the time and energy needed to focus on keeping Clintons from success with “Hillary for President” - This was a boat save and restoration - a labor of love for five years, nearly, and commenced near April 15, 2001.

Now, I am really not sure where I am going with this column - I have fashion and fashionings of 2012 and our politics still to fit and pattern in punditry and political latitude and attitudes.  When J.K. Rowling took to taking more than five years for the seven book challenge - I did consider I needed to find new things to learn, to maintain my secret wizardry of muse street cred.  But some of the trick to such secret musing was facilitated as a general contractor who could hide relevance and purpose of musing by offering my thoughts were just to ponderances for or with homeowners dreaming of change for their front doors - any of their doors.  Oh, yeh, Griffin Hospital doors were part of such secreting of my wizardry and hidden Potter street cred - a friend was a PR director their so a balance to so many Yale doors had opportunity for traction - to “Gryffindor”….  I won’t mention her name here but she did end up marrying another friend from our Jaycees and Special Olympics Games organizing volunteer activities that was then maybe already ESPN Chief Accountant before ending up, if I recall correctly, so now as a chief accounter for Ann Taylor.

Though I did rebuild to Cal 25 heads with new off-shore and in-shore capability using valves and holding tanks and new floors, very small floors both, if I recall correctly with new Formica work by my hands - It was a past door fashioning and fastening for then NSA Advisor Condoleezza Rice for the “Condi condo” that had me see her grand glass enclosed multiple head walk in shower - and shower that I am sure would have pleased Grover Norquist - my old neighbor Grover whose landlord hired me to seal some roof gutters and powerwash and treat roof top deck….  See, I have heard Grover Norquist let loose on his feelings and appreication for large walk-in showers at least for the size of more closet and tiled style in his then rented townhome.  This is about when before Bush tax cuts we were speaking about such and I with thinking that they should move on such for my gut still was haunting me that the Clintons had made some unexpected new expenses something unavoidable as their actual “Surplus” hand me downs/inheritance/buck passing for President Bush.  Oh, it was new closet doors that later Secretary of State then needed for her condo.

There is a difference between porcelain and china - I will leave you to that.  Trenton, New Jersey, somehow may still be the porcelain capital of the world.  Chris Christie’s Trenton, like.

But for American Girl Dolls and fashioning and/or fastening I am taken back to days with Operation Iraqi Freedom was near in its worst state and a contractor asked for another door and a doll shelf, and some custom made raised panel doors for some shelves.  See these two are related for than the particular hard to please customer was our recent Ambassador to Taiwan and as well her husband that was then Secretary Rumsfeld’s Chief of Staff.  It was a second door for a bathroom to become a wall through bath adjoining two rooms in lew of just one.

You could say I have been “in the closet” even “in water closets” for Amanda R. H. for many years, yet not all of above transgressed.  If you read O’HARA’S CHOICE - the last novel by Leon Uris you read about an heiress Amanda as about an heiress Amanda while concerned with “CONSTABLES” and boat builders - refitters - and regular passage likewise right by Marine Barracks on 8th St SE in my then neighborhood.  There were many complications in my life when my challenge to J.K. to write seven books for seven years of advancing curriculum around magic slipped passed fitting into five year allowance, first considered as part of challenge so originally organized.  Leon Uris seemed willing to work himself about such to O’HARA’S CHOICE.  As some of this flowed I did leave J.K. to find her own way to last two books using her feminine and maternal instincts and fan base and fan/market awareness.  And, she didn’t necessarily like that at first - but it was to helping her finish the series with more uniform standards and connected threads.

Yes, it did turn out that my gut feeling that the Clintons were of having left unexpected and surprising new expenses from the Clintonomics and housing bubble “economics” (hard to call it “economics”) and their PEACE DIVIDENDS that likely needed CIA cooperation or lies about a “peace” around sufficient to justify their slashing and burning through existing otherwise more safe and full budgeting in Defense and Intelligence and how so ever as it applied to their serious efforts to hinder FBI with greater walls of separation between its enforcement and intelligence duties.

Hillary Clinton, a.k.a. Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton may deserve a serious dumping now already as near the worst or the actual worst TOP DIPLOMAT that our United States of America has yet had to suffer.  But as per today it seems President Obama of his likeness to “THROWN” wants in more LEW COMPLICIT, and exposed and deserving of a general flushing.  He seems to becoming a bad and dangerous roll model for any’s race to the top. 

He, President Barack Hussein Obama, now has a lot of explaining to do - he has set Americans to “less is more” in more ways than a career advancing merit standard/metric mass reduction.  He has fluffed and puffed as if a grand dandy, but his math - his home economics - are seriously poor and not passing.

To understand how complex and quite complicated my past musing for a growth economy as it was as part of my generous musing in part as a think around use of my BA in Economics while otherwise enough entrepreneurial more boat talk is due and for Amanda Peet casting for Studio 60 so as said “to be Jamie Tarses” of NBC days with FRIENDS Tueday line up and ER for Thursdays at 10pm.  As the basis for David Swimmer character was the swimmer, David from my public high school days and co-tri-captain of swim team with another female Geller, and, that it was this David that I stood with on our sledding hill after bring my plank wood with toe rope “snowboard” to brainstorm with him as to how we could improve its design and have upright sledding fun winter alternative, even maybe on such hill that we sledded as if a natural half pipe.  See:  I owed myself some time getting to fiberglass boat work for we decided to let our ideas go freely to others in part because I thought we should start by cutting up his sailing dingy into shapes that our minds had imagined quite exactly like today’s modern snowboards - even the different possible sizes possible as from cross sections across such where of different “beam.”  He wanted prototype to have metal edges like his skies and I thought as a prototype cut outs from his boat would faster and better at least test or fully imagined and figured concept for a modern snowboard - an improvement on my wood plank board now in a corner feet from where I now blog.

[This column in now a work in progress - may take hours to finish this particular one - expect to see one paragraph or two added bit by bit to same.]

[DONE!  For now - Though George Clooney did more than any other get first cast to play a considered alternate me when at least first cast to ER and so after Jamie Tarses with NBC back in my head and thoughts wondering if I had one more show idea and specifically for Thursdays at 10 slot.  I don’t think I can take credit for all the jobs George Clooney has created - but at least “Burn After Reading” was a continuance or furtherance specific to another Hogan musing - and as I was considering it might be interesting to have Cohen Brothers attempt to play with my already playful thoughts of gym time at Results on Capitol Hill in DC.  I don’t know all his credits so really it would be presumptuous to use “all.”]

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 1:55 pm

Obama’s Lew flushed - flushed out to a dumping on Catholic Church today.  President’s “mouth piece” Chief of Staff Lew offered at least on Fox News Sunday that President’s “principles” are better than Church’s Principles.

My Facebook “status” posts automatically post on my twid @jphoganorg as tweets - This morning Lew on “principles” proclamation as existent in President as other than Catholic and even that of Bible suggested that their Catholic experts were smarter and more right than that of American Catholic Bishops, of Holy See of Pope.

“Twid” = twitter ID (a word I may have invented).

The following are some of what Obama’s Lew seemed to spill out today as if of a complete “principles.” >>

J Peter Hogan
*–@BarackObama — A Book of your Principles? Hmmm, now after Lew
seems such will have to explain your Constitutional skill as about explaining
your Free Sex - Drugs MANDATE doesn’t offer a prejudice and bias if not also
then for those most at risk of AIDS from personal behavior for free AIDS
medicine as a prophylactic to allow them few or no concerns while about
their freedoms. FREE TOO - A without any pre-existing condition bias
allowed. Right? Correct Constitutional interpretation?

*–In the Lew comments a suggestion of President of PRINCIPLES - better
Principles than Catholic Church & its American Bishops - But Obama
book - book of principles? Ok, not “Bible” that taken - “Trible” maybe?
but seems Obama’s Principles being air as “Ible.”

*–Seems that if President is to a “right” to sex - drugs he is then to be
endowed - all future Presidents to mandate a “not in the mood” too.
Can’t say that would be free or less expensive - just that a right to
provide a drug for sex presupposes a right to mandate a pill to “kill
the lust” and “prevent the mood.”

*–Obama could offer rightly concern Catholic Bishops a “pill” alternative for
related sex freedoms - a pill made for mentioned but with something in
it to create a hyper moral paranoia when “stimulated.”

*–No, Obama’s free sex & drug principle for insurance mandates cannot be
free or “less expensive” as Lew flushes — reducing risks for risky
behavior should increase risky behavior and have more people paying for
others increased practice of risky behavior and for products and
services at first claimed important for being too expensive for
“consumers” of Obama’s “sex drugs” implications.

So now to catch up with your thinking let me try to understand how the Catholic Church was supportive of such, so it seemed at least as a right of states, not of State.  We have the economics I am better able to be writting about with some erudition - we have that President Obama is trying to make charity mandatory and of a Government See - his, and, that American Catholic Church is still based upon voluntary charity.

Economically speaking:  We have that even the Church and our religious institutions of America the original providers, and able to cope with such as they did before some of theirs in their own community found new extraordinarily expensive ways to expand the costs of their charity.

Economically speaking:  We have that just the Catholic Charity that was one of our historically original health care providers may have thought that if Government would pay for some of what had been mostly handled by communities willing to gather and sing and have shame exposed (politely?) then they would be free to spend money otherwise, and have it cost them less.

Economically speaking:  Our Governments since such started have like the idea of getting to play the hero with charity more than they should been allowed or permitted themselves and offering of.  We have that once our Government became a player that it may have started costing our communities and their houses of worship too much by making their value seem diminished and so to a reduction near to obsolescence of its relativity and attractiveness.  Did our first Government establishments to such assumption of presumption to Christian Charity and the likes begin a depreciation of our communities houses of worship and establishments to a moral continuum maintained locally such that a shifting of healthcare costs did costs such too much?

Economically speaking:  Did the first passing of the buck by our houses of worship even though if just to states, not State, amount to the beginning of the end of “affordable” care?  When whence the “religious” community organizing tried to see if their job would become less expensive if they did shift costs for such community moral maintenance to Government did they allow State a dangerous and expensive hand in what had been their keep or kitty?  Did our community faith organizations end up losing membership and thus revenues needed to sustain important community endeavors exactly because they attempted to let Government play at their alters?

J Peter Hogan

*–Politically speaking:  Is President Obama trying to outlaw the seven deadly sins?  - Remove “premeditation” from conscious human behavior?

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 11:32 pm

To start we could all try to offer Catholic University governors a work around for conscience violations of Obama’s healthcare barriers.  First though we should consider how many phrases and areas of study or expertise are actually involved.

I don’t know what they are teaching I don’t know how their bi-laws are parsed and nuanced - I don’t argue that their beauty is that they value humanity in its human potential as you can carry it anywhere, hopefully.  I don’t assert or profess that they support or profess that one good Catholic bull is enough for forty women.

This is not a battle legal I am trained for but their is some innocent sharing and debating in the air not too suggestive that colleges have become breading centers, and not all about promiscuity.

It is not a “health issue” so far as I can see as assert so far heard so claiming against Church positions.

It is a barrier to existentialism in ones vital humanity - one’s possible enhanced Catholic humanity fully celebratory of beauty of being human and all its natural potential.  It is about asking for a barrier to ones humanity as per so far heard assaults and relative religious traditions or standards.

While now forced so far into such a public airing so with intrusive over-reaching by nearly still green lawyer President Obama we have some drawn into vulnerable public displays speaking to emotion and suggestive of promiscuity and maximum use of and need for contraception.  And to first taking me back to memories of my college days at a Catholic University where single sex dorms and very limited visitation hours its prophylactic, primarily provided.

I have not been to such a unchecked open range discussion of so much of these complex issues that is now so public at least since college but likely yet not actually since high school.

If it were as simple as a “medical provisioning” and a “health concern” then Catholic Universities would be just a proper as arguments I have heard against them and principled to such perspective with a work around more in keeping with their conscience and defense of humanity and its Holy potential - without chemical or physical barriers.

See:  I am obviously not trained or self taught in the philosophies of the complexities of these belief issues.

If it is to be not a life issue of barriers suggestive of conditioning of humanity of their students/charges then it is either a “barrier” offering a valuation or devaluation of life or of human condition/humanity and potentials to holiest existentialism.

It is so at this state that a few suggestions are already in the air to offer Catholic University governors some “work around” but still only if specific reported wording of mandates are also changed quite a bit.

1.  Catholic Universities could suggest a new “Cougar” state for education and work a new education plan to encourage full embrace of humanity earlier if so much activity the craving now so as it appears with youths wanting love free - and so be to embracing women to be older college students and men to enter yet when still mostly boys.  Is there still to much of a stigma to success for women now just because a later in life education not the current standard?

2.  Catholic Universities if such is supposed to not be a condition of students wanting love free and with free barriers to their human existentialism to avoid any metaphysics - self awareness - stoicism or reflection, could be to treating it fully as a concern medical and social and offer contraception cover to just the male students but with limited dosages and requirements for couples screening - with both consenting active sex explorers agreeing to full biological and psychological work-ups for “health” and “care” concerns.

Again, I am not trained in these areas of Catholic ministration or governance, I am trying to explore the lighter sides now as much a necessary and proper realm of judicial considerations as our President’s mandates so writ are about trampling our Constitution and basic principles.  President Obama, who wanted to have a “Personality Based Presidency”, is may now showing too much moodiness and irregular rationalizations.

Ok, so I have offered a change to “Cougar Universities” and that coverage if for “health” and “medical” though actually a physical barrier to Catholic traditions to train and instruct to the full beauty of unencumbered humanity - (hmmm? “unencumbered” - Catholic in naked beauty and without manufactured barriers?).  And, I have offered coverage might be conscionable for Catholic University governors if provide just under male students health plans but with small dosage amounts and a requirement before issuance of a full medical physical and mental work up of both passionate partners. 

3.  All Catholic students could go Dutch yet with a requirement if the argument is for the Catholic Institutions to “care” and “intrude” in the physical personal and private naked expressions of its charges/students where half of each contraception is covered for male student and a necessary other half covered for the female students (even if to “Cougar” new traditions) and still though to preserve the Catholic conscience with a requirement for full couple matching and health check ups maybe at least twice a month for check-ups and then as regular as necessary related to promiscuity of student(s) for the full physical and mental desired health guardianship being suggested as each woman’s private right.

We are still just talking now about how President’s predilection to violate our Constitution is now touching all college aged person in America and many more personally and spiritually as per his attempt to dictate again mandates that again show him quite arguably still green as an esquire, and even naive as an administer - as a President. 

I don’t have time now to discuss more of these concerns about REPUBLICAN BULL(S) - I did confirm that for cows one bull is said to be enough in a ranches herd for forty cows.  I don’t know how the President plans to address this side of his assault on Catholic celebration and traditions long to the beauty of humanity in all it unbridled nakedness.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 3:28 pm

Now this could get real interesting for bloggers and politicos, journalists and general folk, politicians and people, if even just the Church were to start into an in depth psycho babble about Dem’s rabble rousing quite related to valuation and devaluation of life politicing.

Since I am one more want to write about economic stuff and can explain how economy started its down turn much because Senator Clinton announced a bid to reacquire White House for her “two-fer” specifically with the over-reaching clearly stated near:  I will seize all oil company profits - I will wait but wait with anticipation and fore-knowledge whence of how nervous new President Clinton was while preparing for his first visiting with the Pope.

I find myself today with three different events I could have or might have attended.  I registered to attend at Yale School of Architecture a multi-day event to delve into and discuss art and drafting as near a lost art now in computer drafting era, and yet don’t see myself finding time to attend.  I as well see that CPAC is gathering and am wondering why I didn’t also register for such even if I too wouldn’t find time to attend.  And then the global Social Media Week has kicked off today.

We have that Al Gore’s GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM best explains the housing crash, but only after realizing how Clinton’s housing bubble PEACE DIVIDENDS - SURPLUS economy pushed Americans to spend too much, eat too much and stop saving enough so that when Gore’s ALARMISM started and caused the spike in gas prices from over subjectivication of market behavior such the children were going home to call their parents the likes of “Polar Bear Killer!” or “Destroyer of the Environment”.  We have that once Gore’s ALARMISM caused the fuel price spike those many that Clintons had encouraged and mislead to maxing out their spending could no longer afford the gas to get to work or then keep the dangerous balance that kept up hyper-consumerism on false economic basis.

So as Conservatives gather with CPAC we all have Governor Mitch Daniels splendid recent Republican Response to SOTU to consider and its erudition that the President “did not create down economy” - however he worded it.  No, well yes, well no President Obama didn’t - yes - but no, Democrats Clinton - Gore - Pelosi - Clinton specifically otherwise did.

But as per a full understanding of some of the complexity of our past economy - there is much to consider that was stimulative in 1990s that was created and furthered specifically from a personal think and strategizing purposeful to “PROTECT” America and our economy from the Clintons.  This is a little considered economic factor that good economy of 1990s wasn’t something the Clintons owned and could attempt to pass spouse to spouse for mutual benefit financial and political to their ‘two-fer”.

If you do get to considering any, some, or much, attempt a full understanding of my past involvement in economic development and stimulation than it may help to consider that most of what I came up with and was to originating in decade before Clintons ever did enter 1992 race was done with an awareness and concern about them and design to protect myself and others from them, and not meant to be for their benefit as happened during their first term.

When Senator Clinton announced her attempt to succeed in the type of behavior I long expected from her much that had been stimulative and economicly mutual was naturally to stopping, and stopping because it wasn’t designed to work for her - as it was designed and encouraged like my musing for J.K. Rowling to help protect many from her.  There was a balance in such that would shut down if someone like her tried to hog power and crediting.

But it was most Al Gore’s GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM that started economy on road to “tanked” for too many that were mislead by Clintons to max out their consumerism couldn’t afford their mortgages and the new spiking price of gas and first though likely the money to pay for more costly gas just to get to work.  I can remember working in DC those years and seeing just one type of steel I would by for custom welding work for Asylum Wake-Skate-Snow stores I was designing and building nearly double in price from about 12 dollars to 25 dollars for a 20 foot 2 x2 14 gauge steel section.

By the way the way Operation Iraqi Freedom was started and planned it was more of ODYSSEY DAWN messaging of an involvement that was suppose to pay for itself - was paid for by plans at least until Pelosi Congress got busy making it mostly and unfunded expensive hard to budget vast liability.

So there was much in what I was doing that was expiring from being stimulative to economy and then some parts that would fall apart if likes of Clintons tried to hog power, and hog power for too long.  But there is some blame to fall on President Obama, but quite as Governor Mitch Daniels has explained not for having caused the down economy.

President Obama rose asking to be our chosen President during a developing and so well know economic down turn - and so should avoid stating that he “inherited” what he actually knowing fought long and hard to possess as his.  But President Obama has accountability for length of down economic time for he asked to have a personality based Presidency, and was given all the room he as our first black President should deserve to develop and economy street cred for himself based only on his “personality.”

Sure, what ever I was doing to help economy still since many of the lost hours of our 90s towards such, and again as per my motives as a check and balance to Clintons and not ever hardly to honor or celebrate the Clintons.  Almost all I have ever done to help economy was specifically done with a knowledge of both Clintons that dates back to early 70s and as they left me wired like a fly on the wall for they once asked me if they could both become President some day.  The left a bad first impression but I was in a school yard and already wanting to be a top ad man someday like my maternal grandfather so stomping on their dreaming seemed inappropriate - at least until they actually tried to accomplish some of their thinking they long kept me exposed to.

What wasn’t expiring of mine towards economic stimulus before Senator Clinton announced near Fascist plans to seize all oil company profits then became due a wrapping up and closing out.

What Senator Clinton or Al Gore weren’t already doing to suppress our economy then became a political and fairness concern about right and wrong and the right of a first black President to have all the room to effect a “personality Presidency” as he claimed he planned to attempt. 

Republicans cannot be blamed for President Obama not having had the “personality” to bring and economic recovery.   And, again most of what I had been doing without credit/acknowledgement or compensation a couple decades had been already reaching the end and maturity of most of what ever all it may have been. 

And, President Obama wanted to succeed with a clean slate of a “new foundation” and deserved the right to develop his own economic street cred.

Yes, I remember how nervous President Clinton seemed before his first visit to meet with the Pope.  I remember he being grateful some for my (moral?) support whence, and as I felt somewhat responsible for having helped Clintons become more electable against President Bush than I had meant to. 

To figure this in those times and global conditions it helps to remember what Cheneys’ quoted Thaddeus Stevens about regarding Reconstruction and Congress a better body for such - it can help to consider that I was thinking America actually after 1992 needed basically a “do nothing President” - I don’t know where I may have written that down but I sure used to say it a lot back then.

It seems the Clintons and Obama weren’t concerned about my past efforts expiring since they never picked up a pen or phone to call and solicit help or a right to any attempt at an authorized first lawful usage.  So much that the Clintons did use after 1992 unexpected victory that stemmed from my thinking was not thought to be for an after election usage or designed to be such, nor was such ever authorized unless actually of a national security concern specifically responsive to threats from Saddam Hussein.

I long have found the Clintons’ practice of “transference” and/or “projection” intolerable and abominable.  I did feel some responsibility after they won 1992 election but never gave them permission to keep using so much that stemmed from me and my story and much because most of it was originally conceived and strategized to be a prophylactic from them. 

But with that said let me be clear:  What they persisted in using that did stem from me wasn’t designed to be used the way they used it nor was it at all how I would have proceeded following on from or with such, myself.  They did use stuff that if they had asked me I would have said they couldn’t but while also explaining that they shouldn’t and that I would not have myself.  By the end of their first year the did some stuff that left no way back, and so as characteristic of the very character flaws I had thought I had worked a way to at least protect more than myself, by a few.

It really could get interesting if our religious institutions now progress with their defense in an erudite synthesis inclusive of most concerning and latest in psycho-babble. 

And again, the Clintons’ political practices of “transference” and “projection” have at least since 1992 been abhorred by me.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 7:21 am

We are here today to raise Representative John Murtha of Pennsylvania, not to praise him.

There are few others more responsible for confusions that led to Senator Richard Santorum having lost his last Senate race.

Top of such list is the confusion that spread while spewed by Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts and as well Representative John Murtha of Pennsylvania.  The Pope for having said something instead of more or nothing may actually so as per Senate seat loss for Santorum be tops.

Working from memory now this morning I think I will be hitting the issues near enough in proper order and so with fair relating to how it can be, though only maybe because of the Pope, that Senator Richard Santorum did get “Murthanized.”

This is a day I am maybe due a search pane primary keyword probing even just with “Kerry.”  I should have a lot already said towards much of these matters, somewhere, that speak to how Senator Kerry dumbed down all of Middle East politics while specifically then of efforts long and tiring to make Iraq seem of Operation Iraqi Freedom for a singular simplicity too elementary and parochial.  We can all use a refresher now that it more obvious that Iraq and Operation Iraqi Freedom were never as simple and reducible as made out to be by Senator John Kerry.

Senator Hillary Clinton is basically, intellectually, a non issue as per Operation Iraqi Freedom - she flip flopped so many times and after an early acknowledgement of lack of due diligence specific of having voted without having read the intelligence estimates.

Recently I recalled and re-posted comments specific to my understanding of content of the Pope’s remarks prepared and delivered for American Catholic audiences and others.  Recently I wrote again, as I was regular to while Senator Santorum and many others were being “Murthanized” in chorus with monotonous and elementary beat of Senator Kerry of Massachusetts.  Just recently I pointed out just one of many ways this Senator from Massachusetts was wrong in dumbing down Operation Iraqi Freedom and most of Middle East geo-politics.  I recently included now old thoughts that the Pope’s message about Catholics not having a duty to support war in Iraq or “Operation Iraqi Freedom” as Catholics was in part needed so that President Bush wouldn’t  seem to be engaged in Holy War but as well just an otherwise parochial instruction to American Catholics that as Catholics they had no special duty calling them to go into a sovereign Muslim country to help bring justice to a Muslim majority from a Muslim minority.

It is considerable and suggestible that some or more from Massachusetts should have been objecting to their Senator’s very partisan and excessive politicization of United States of America efforts as regards Operation Iraqi Freedom.  Senator Kerry did more to dumb down the issues and complexity and while willful in a political battle may joined no more greatly than by Representative John Murtha of Pennsylvania.  Today Senator Kerry’s efforts could be illuminated best in retrospect by suggesting he was as smart as a little boy proudly announcing to his mom and neighbors that he had invented a better wheel and while walking around with a square “wheel” in a too public “show n tell”.

But for the Pope’s instructions that failed to get the thought due, but maybe specifically due to champions in a dumbing such as Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha, we have that Senator Santorum got “Murthanized” more than “mislead” by the Pope.  The Pope did confuse matters by not offering to American Catholics that otherwise than as Catholics they might have a duty to Country as Americans and its legacies and reliance on jurisprudence and precedence.  But, if not for the massive efforts of just Kerry and Murtha in their partisan and polarizing political dumbing down the Pope’s opinions might have been better considered and more thoroughly thought through in public arena and electoral contests.

It is ridiculous now still to embrace “Bush lied - soldiers died” as if it were the be all and end all that was all we were needing to know and yet, and yet that is much the key to the beat that saw not just Senator Santorum get “Murthanized.”  Senator Kerry and a big Marine in his song and dance - he had Representative John Murtha, “Marine” - “War Expert.”

I guess most of my blogging on this when it was all new and most dangerous and concerning is archived with newbusters.org and politico.com.  I was a regular strong commentator on threads then with efforts to keep it real - I was never one to like Senator Kerry of Massachusetts since Operation Iraqi Freedom started, at least, at least nearly, for he acted crassly like a turn coat and too political after the commitment to be in Iraq started.  When you look back he doesn’t look so heroic - a look back has him too seemingly of sufficient briefing before vote to have addressed all issues before we had committed troops and yet of a waiting until after President Bush was committed to be of the proverbial pulling of a rug from under such.

It did seem Senator Kerry did more to undermine Operation Iraqi Freedom and the expected and needed confidence of at least a majority of Iraq than any other than say Representative Murtha.  We have that Massachusetts’ Senator seemed to want an anti-war revival more than a well run Operation Iraqi Freedom and that his efforts suggestive of a cut and run did end up making our agreed on efforts for Iraq take longer and cost us dearly much more.

It just seems ridiculous to still consider that Senator Kerry’s perspective and summations “educated” or “intelligent” - though that they seem of a pining and romance want for a new anti-war era to recall his earlier post-war anti-war past - as that though that we have learned Iraq was as complicated and as much a tinder box as per Iran and nuclear power and sectarian strife with the history of Saddam Hussein actually of having years sent his Shiite subjects off into Iran to kill their Shiite brethren. and be killed by them.

Senator Rick Santorum lost his last Senate seat mostly because he was “Murthanized” and while Catholics were still not provided fair media coverage to discuss that the Pope’s message wasn’t conclusive to their “American” duties.  It is complicated for President Bush could be said to have had a duty to comment on the Pope’s directives as per Iraq and for even Pennsylvania Catholics - but not necessarily easily without there then too great a risk that Operation Iraqi Freedom could seem as if a crusade or Holy War.

At least now more know that both Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha were not at the top of their game, and shouldn’t have been playing political games so with our brave of our Armed Forces - and as that they had time to have objected before we became committed and didn’t have to start undermining the efforts just days after it commenced, for real of actual realities. 

But as per Santorum’s Pennsylvania we should ask them now if it was the Pope’s message to American Catholics as equal and the same as all Catholics or more the “Murthanization” of a Marine turned anti-war activist and yet still a “war expert” too complicit with dumbing down by Senator from Massachusetts John Kerry.

2006 & 2007 were busy years for blogging to counter some of above ridiculousness - real quite so, so much so it may explain best why there was a mirror on cover of TIME magazine the year after Putin so adorned “Person of the Year.”

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 8:08 pm

Hmmm - Seems it better to leave this for our Religious institutions as a battle or the battle they are trained for.

I get the Obama administration thought they needed to try to evangelize Obamacare support, and so while with such only then not quite to a clear majority of support after a year so preaching for his legislative overreaching.  I can remember and hope you do that Pelosi Congress worked to belittle the majority expression specific from gospels of Obamacare preaching and so that they could use “elected” officials from representative considerations at least a year earlier and when citizen people less specifically informed.

But if we are One Nation Under God - how are any Religious institutions secured to preserve and protect such realm supposed to let Obama insert himself between them and their God - and have us stay American?  Seems before, legally speaking, a once Constitutional Law Professor did take to trying to insert himself between “Under God” and “Church” he should at least have at least tried as well to dictate that “ONE NATION UNDER GOD” be stricken and removed where ever and how ever so present as American.

I get that President Obama was Constitutionally out of line suggesting his dictates about Christ should or could be law so as a sound national basis for Congress to make laws of establishment of religion by his say so. 

Hmmm - Seems it better to leave this for our Religious institutions as a battle or the battle they are trained for.

I do get that our states now more than maybe ever before have their National Guard Forces at battle ready - battle hardened.

I still disagree with President Obama and his Secretary of State most though because I believe their foreign policies are wrong for America of 2012 and onward - that any NEW NATIONALISM on top of this already long bad and more bad and much worse.  I still believe I should focus more on how Dems did actually cause this down economy and that their foreign policies are still about the worst we could be attempting to move forward with and not just because of concerns specific to weakness in personality of Obama or his foreign policy staff that may relate as well to above but not more so than those with him in his domestic dictates.

Yes, I do believe - I do believe that Democrats have caused this down economy.   I do get that current conflict had President dressed up for dictating about “LIFE” and either offering a devaluation or valuation of issues of rights from God that I know I am not trained to answer and think that he hardly is himself. 

Hmmm - What was that huge church Stalin torn down to build a great monument to himself that then due to war never did get built were huge Russian Church (Cathedral) had once stood proudly on its shining hill?

Left to me it might get surreal in an odd suggestion of and “if then” for President Obama the “community organizer” that if he is to now have such power(s) he economically speaking would be better to healthcare reform and community restoration per his example to dictate that all communities are required to corral all their neighbors and for at least Sunday Service with tithing restored to communities ability to budget unexpected healthcare costs.  As it is he is a-rye for not following Church  - for his funding system for such with his predilection to dictate mandates and required tax payments though based on income not base on voluntary participation and contribution. 

No it seem, if left to me, I would have to look at economics of healthcare reform politics and cost and suggest that President use these powers if actually his to a way maybe most sure to help reduce costs about healthcare among counties and communities and by dictating that all must attend a house of worship and with mandates his dictate to required contributions some how still with him wanting of a desire or think to call it still “charity.”  No, better not for me to answer - seems President could over-turn Obamacare himself and for a likely greater cost saving and community restoration summation with at least a suggestion that communities and counties with renewed civil civic freedom to worship with actual worshiping.


Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 7:42 pm

This is what I chose to quickly reread or scan tonight:  This was the columns for the month of April 2010:


This was my first month using URL “myblog” — there are the near 227 columns from the near year before of original jphogan.org blog page that are now still hidden that precede these, and maybe so that some “context” to new in old.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 7:06 pm

Democrats most are now still hung up with the misbegotten oral legacy of the Clinton Presidency.   We have a Catholic issue now that may though date to Hillary Rodham Democrat Party defense during Watergate just as much, and yet more Constitutional.

Our First Amendment is to that Congress shall make no law respecting establishment of religion - and Watergate and “DEEP THROAT” misnomers and politics still today weaken Church positions are regards our Constitution due to decades of Democrat power reaching about “DEEP THROAT” partisan politics of metrics of communions.  Since Watergate days our state has assumed and presumed a breaking of bread superiority for at least its Democrat Partisan Politics.

There is a lot to parse and reconsider now - we have President Obama now stepping out more against selective communions once better protected and preserved with our separations.

It has been decades now that Democrats have played all to thinking it was all just the Republicans fault and without having to consider what cause Democrats might have given to give rise to Watergate “Plumbers” as to of an import to check the legal and/or illegal flow stemming from Dem HQ.

Catholics were recently challenged by Rome and Pope to think for themselves - at least back when Rome offered statements regarding Operation Iraqi Freedom and as well to American Catholics of such not being a duty or calling for Catholics - a battle theirs.  This on its face only seemed to have offered a Catholic response to Catholic “family” religious participation.  This on its face left open for American Catholics that though as Catholics not called to then be mixed up as of a duty to like bring justice to Muslims for other Muslims, so, that as Americans they could be called as American Catholics secularly in their American.

The Pope’s message as regards Operation Iraqi Freedom seems still to have only answered for American Catholics issues regarding their global Catholicism and as of no religious duty to go into a Muslim country to help Muslims get justice from other Muslims.

For Catholics now in America to exercise protections of our First Amendment and all our original Constitutionality must a re-opening of Watergate and “DEEP THROAT” secularism be commenced? 

Has our Executive Branch since whence been of a presumption to dictate ecumenical specificities - Catholic doctrine, too?  Though “DEEP THROAT” started not of the “BJ” politics celebrated by Clintons but more as of a tag for a perp than a social or political sucking up of consenting adults of sufficient age, it did become what it wasn’t and far deeper than any associated guilt would have been decideable.  As a nick-name offered for a federal focus as per concerning political threats with ties to Dem HQ it was never what it became, it did become what it became, though started otherwise, for “Plumbers” justification became admissible yet while a fair or full disclosure would have created collateral damage factors greater than original concerns.  Mark Felt as “DEEP THROAT” still seems more as of a duty in damage control to protect privacy and innocence - though “DEEP THROAT” really was the cause about the prudence towards Dem HQ attempted snooping - for corruption, so it still seems.

President Bush did keep Operation Iraqi Freedom from being interpretable as a Holy War and kept it to a secular and prudent effort to better jurisprudence to more being treated equally.  

President Obama has a Ba’athist problem still.  It is told by Alan Hart in his book ARAFAT - TERRORIST OR PEACE MAKER like that Saddam’s Ba’athist party started out to be to a United Arab Socialist State and then got perverted by others into a way to get and keep power more secularly selfishly where ever.  We have that Saddam Hussein rose to power in his Ba’athist Party as an assassin.  We have that many Democrats including President Obama were want to let at least Saddam’s Ba’athist party stay in power if Saddam H. himself had to go.

I don’t know how the Catholic Church can fully or fairly establish its rights to be of old and original intent.  Since Dems and media took ownership of “DEEP THROAT” for secular populism the ecumenical and selective communion criteriums (criteria?) have been Constitutionally compromised without much contest.  It may help to look at Democrats for “character” and at their attempts to let Ba’athists slide for so much to stay an ally in secular control by minorities - It may help now to see Democrats as those willing to let Saddam Hussein off just not without prosecution but as well without any confession, and because the ideology of Ba’athism started as to being to a Socialist ideal.

As American Catholics it seems such Americans as Catholics had no duty as Catholics as mentioned to go to a Muslim state to offer assistance to Muslims even of the majority towards justice from other Muslims.  As American Catholics with jurisprudence and pledges eternal against all forms of tyranny over minds of men - and the past complicity of their United States of America and precedence political and legal of reconstruction efforts post past previous prudent postings - and as Americans called then though, secularly, as American Catholics in their “American - a duty did exist even for American Catholics to be for Iraq at least what it had been some to Japan and Germany after early global entanglements of warring with allies.

Our First Amendment does specify that out Congress cannot make laws respecting establishment of religion, and that President Obama has been “FROSTY” with a preponderance presumption more “Nixonian” than Nixon’s to of “IF A PRESIDENT SAYS IT IS LEGAL THEN IT IS LEGAL.” 

It seems apparent now more since maybe since before Watergate and media taking of “DEEP THROAT” as their darling, and in a partisan secular communion partisan and political without America much having to ask or learn of how Democrats were better on the defensive even then that we now have a First Amendment issue critical to Obamacare overreaching and Catholic beliefs.

President Obama has been wrong recently to offer his “Christianity” as an argument for Congress to act and legislate as he was want to dictate towards specific making of laws so respecting, maybe, only his establishment of religion.  He has been quite secular and demonstratively so for a while, otherwise, except in so such that Obamacare does fail even a First Amendment challenge as per it an attempt to justify as if “Christian Charity” establishment - but secular too.

How does Catholic Church now reset its specific ecumenical American presence and province?   How do we all now restore our First Amendment rights and in a less communioned partisan where “DEEP THROAT” partisan popularism is reset to Nixonian conditions where “DEEP” a tag for not so guilty minor perp who deserved protection from national “Plumbers” politics too - and as American populism about politics of “DEEP THROAT” only had a basis in improper and “not deep” minor considerations - that though had corruption stemming from Dem HQ of a maybe childish threat - national and political?

I for one, have long never believed allowing Ba’athists of Saddam Hussein’s minority governance of or near tyrannical had any right or reason towards “staying” in power.  I still now cannot figure how Democrats were willing and near successful, otherwise.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 2:39 pm

We have heard long enough that imitation is possibly flattery.  President Obama, it seems, now has two Nixon problems, at least.

Imitation though can be a matter of LAW AND ORDER and now an opportunity - duty - opening, for “tricky” Mitt.

It is a toss up.  I am not sure what I will be cooking tonight - I may be putting out a cross-partisan local and global calorie count. 

I have had my MAXIM longer than some of my maxims,  though longer than my carbon steel restaurant style cooking wok and nearly two foot long stainless steel spatula, and those far longer than my still new pizza stone that has me now to attempting New York style thin crust pizza from home.

I find my thoughts have me learning from a variety of TV cooks now though more often not to attempt to imitate. 

President Richard Milhous Nixon lost his first election - he lost his Whittier High School run for Class President to another named Logue.  Secretary Hillary Clinton helped take down President Nixon for matters then that now look minor compared to Obama snooping e-like standards.  Secretary Hillary Clinton helped take down President Nixon and yet now may be copying him on China more than any other - and hoping people don’t see it as it stands inviolate as quite a bit of flattery.

So will I now cook out to New York thin crust pizza imitating tonight and now experimental for first now of a pizza stone and cooking with yeast to using earlier hand made dough, now defrosting?

Will my Maxim electric wok be put into service as a deep fryer for fried chicken, again made without aid of an existing recipe?

I have had my Maxim wok since mid 80s and for use specifically for stir frying from Ken Hom’s recipes of Chinese Cookery.  I didn’t buy my carbon steel restaurant style cooking wok (kept for when of gas stoves) until 1987 when I moved to Boston area.  My steel wok best for gas cooking is from a restaurant supply store of Boston’s China Town.

“Tricky” Mitt is a far cry better a Presidential nick-name than that unfortunate one the preceded with “Tricky Dick” the Nixon walking with and around “Deep Throat” and “Watergate.”

President Bush once was our Ambassador to China, and that before he became Director of Central Intelligence.

The other later President Bush must have done pretty well for us as regards China - Obamanoughts are imitating more than criticizing - yet avoiding suggestions that flattery due.

We are now to a consideration that Mitt Romney, nominee, can offer Republicans a pride in Nixon and his LAW AND ORDER aspirations - if only because those of Obama Administration have been to so much arguable “flattery” with so much theirs now an imitation of his.

His Chinese, President Obama’s foreign plating, has broken the Mormon barriers already - we all should easily remember that as per critical relations with whom that is becoming a great ally - greater ally - he leaned on a Republican - he leaned on Jon Huntsman Jr.  We do have that if President Nixon hadn’t had lost his Whittier Class Presidency election just so nor had “Tricky Dick” as nick-name a pre-existing condition once “Watergate” broke we would likely have Obama and his Secretary of State needing to footnote and document their flattery that is so much imitation of President Richard Milhous Nixon at least as per China - right?

If you consider or accept that “Deep Throat” started as an official FBI concern and a case file name that gave cause and suggestion that powers corrupt we stemming from Dem HQ you may begin to understand why J. Edgar Hoover was afraid, after so many years closely working with Liberal Democrats to spear head such an investigation, overtly or covertly.  If history now becomes more exposed to a time-line for Nixon’s “Plummers” as first of a FBI official word of mouth earful concern about a then open “Deep Throat” nom de plume - then our long trying partisan storification resets to “Tricky Mitt” opportunities to bring late law and order for President Nixon whence “Tricky Dick” became an X-rated exposure un-Presidential and a media darling then unavoidable.

I do expect I will be dialing up my Maxim electric wok as a deep fryer for some fried chicken and likely as well though to dough work and pizza stone baking to some personal size New York thin crust cheese pizzas.  My Boston bought carbon steel wok and stainless steel spatula are in storage until I again am cooking with gas.  I haven’t decided yet whom I am rooting for - and may not until after the game - I come from a town/city betwixt and between the two franchises.  I may be stuck just looking for sportsmanship and honor on the field of play.

It is remarkable how Nixon may become the new Reagan even if Obama is re-elected.  Obama’s quiet but public imitation is amounting to much flattery that cannot help but become exposed during general election against any Republican nominee, now.

We have witnessed since SOTU 2012 that President Obama chose to start off in such towards 2012 as if running as the “GOOD” Mitt Romney and with hopes that he will be able to trap “Tricky” Mitt into being only able to present as a new and bad - changed from whence Governor, Mitt Romney.  President Obama though is now getting stuck for Constitutional misunderstanding of our protected rights of our First Amendment, and well Candidate Mitt Romney, also of Harvard Law seems to have a different interpretation.  President Obama may now have to explain all of THE FEDERALIST PAPERS if to prove Mitt Romney is now a “BAD” Mitt and he is our only hope - PBO may have to explain how Candidate MR is consistent with Publius pieces and so that PBO now more of as if New York state wouldn’t have entered our Constitutional Union if there hadn’t been those THE FEDERALIST PAPERS.

First out of the gates to 2012 from which ever corner Candidate Willard Mitt Romney has a chance to be a new and improved LAW AND ORDER PRESIDENT and with pride as “Tricky Mitt” - if it comes to that.  We have that though successes of Obama - Clinton foreign policy, seemingly dependent on them having had the ambassadorial assistance with China so whence then of Republican Jon Huntsman Jr. they have been contrary and disavowing of due process protections dangerously, and publicly.  If a time-line is adjusted respective of Nixon’s Presidency to pay more attention to his loss to Logue and later as relevant more to years Hillary Rodham of Watergate Hearing staff duties as of “Deep Throat” having been an inconvenient naming as inconvenient as “Tricky Dick” afterwards and one that has today official sympathies that then were not necessarily admissible in defense of Republican President, though records may be able to establish that it was a case file name that gave cause for an official snooping by FBI but one that J. Edgar Hoover felt too exposed still with Kennedy Democrat associations to execute in house.  Who do we have to dig down deep enough into all this now - Anyone?

Is Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton (a.k.a. Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton) now imitating freely and without due credit and historical bibliography and footnotes the Republican President she helped take down, and as flattery she is hoping people won’t get to discussing?

We have many issues to see walked about and talked about throughout remainder of primary season and then whence to general election contests best now to a new and improved and more historical intellectual honesty.  We have that this administration has run our due process into same ditch much of their driving of false stories did to our economy during 2007 and 2008 - We have a new need to reset even maybe to Republican Presidency of Richard Milhous Nixon and to a refreshed “LAW AND ORDER” reglobalized with a new localization and decentralization effectation even more than we need now a new President Ronald Reagan.

A “Tricky Mitt” Constitutionally safer now as also a Harvard Law Grad than President Barack Obama and likely able to explain that his is the real “GOOD” Mitt still and yet able to explain that Democrats are being BAD NIXONIANS more that Nixon actually was. 

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 12:10 pm

Your bureau may be all disarrayed and the Martians may be a competitive bunch strong of faith.

As you may recall, Ron Paul, Representative to Congress for part of the State of Texas and an also ran for President in 2012, did speak in a debate of an invitation to ride. 

Some cycling is unavoidably of a haunted or haunting in an a priori and/or a posteriori revolutionary concern.

As I heard candidate Ron Paul with his Texas invitation to ride I was stirred and interested - and again with prepository reflection to be not too Campy, and somewhat spurred on still by rise of SRAM - as of years of concern that American cyclists to be globally competitive as American had to find an alternative to riding Japanese or French all the time, or only.

Governor Mitt Romney is on track with velo-ness of sufficient velocity and banking with his Olympic past venue friendly sufficiently moderated internationalism so too trued not to be too SRAM RED or CAMPY or high stepping SHIMANO “RACING”.  Governor Mitt Romney may be now better than recycled LAW AND ORDER to a candidate now toeing the lines as if to soon a new and improved NIXONIAN better to LAW AND ORDER PRESIDENCY.

A business training now beyond just Marketing 101 beginner limits is not necessarily a requirement to ride out rest of this storification.  It might help - but only towards and early or more certain appreciation of its market value and truisms/truths.

To be a top racing cycling personality it is like getting to Carnegie Hall, supposedly.   Like > “PRACTICE - PRACTICE - PRACTICE!  And like their needs to be a passion and commitment and a history of quality and appreciation for the best that is available, scientifically most advanced and as well with soft sciences more of best in marketing and advertising penmanship.

The Kennedy Legacy and working to Camelot courting for America did leave room for improvement and even for others later as well of an Irish Catholic American rooting.  There is always a Lancelot in Camelot - though not necessarily always the happiest of Knights nights.  When there is political competition there still is always a competition with Camelot and lances, and now Bushes of Texas long of New Haven and Connecticut rallying and competitiveness.

When I met Eric Heiden he was new to competitive road racing cycling challenges and just recently from front pages for 1980 Olympic speed skating prominence.  In both sports he may have been more of ROBIN HOOD MEN IN TIGHTS than CAMELOT styled armor.  At such moment in American cycling history we still had the Wright ministries, however, more of their flights than their cycling - but a proud American competitive example and legacy - at about that time that I lived a block away from the race course for New Haven Columbus Day Bike Race.

I did respond via facebook to Ron Paul and his cycling quip to offer that I would ride with him if he happened to be in New Haven, Connecticut area and to my old haunts still stirring from early 1980s and especially some hills within his 25 mile range mentioned.  As a budding cycling enthusiast from early 80s when Campy (Campagnolo) gear almost the only choice available if a racer you wanted to be.  The Japanese were on the rise - I was then able to shop bike upgrades to earlier heavy more “commuter” rides as I was want to be more for America by being for Japanese instead of selling out to French Campy.

I don’t know how Representative Ron Paul rides or want his mount is - what he rides.  I sounds as if he is a road cycling enthusiast but he could be a off-road “mountain biker” more like President Bush.  He likely rides with as much chivalry as he runs.  He likely rides wondering still how to carry a Lance.  He was a doctor - is still a doctor officially too, I think - Doctors work with lances, at least as a scalpel or lancet.

As a budding road cyclist more towards touring than racing I did consider much and as if an ambassador for American cycling specifically for those who may use the same quality or better and for competition and competitiveness.  I was a budding bike mechanic already with neighborhood clientelle also professionally reliant on good and best lances, and so that for at least a client I did clean and maintain some good Campy.

I know when I bought my used and then new Rams I was still considering all past cycling networking and considerations - I can remember to before the days of SRAM and SRAM RED.  I still have my now vintage Shimano complete groupo of 600ex but for last year finally swapping out the rear hub to facilitate 16 speeds as upgrade from 12.  I could have used the Park Wheel Truing Stand - the one in 80s I could borrow time on in neighborhood by another doctor yet one less dependent on lances has moved with its owner now maybe many times.  I do not know its owners politics but do know his ride stayed true to facts that President Bush had been a college chum - a collegiate bud.  I did rebuild my own rear wheel and while working as if an accidental tourist only having trained eye and bike to use to get to true.

I can remember back to old shop talk while visiting or shopping at frequented area bike shops of my asking questions like: “Why don’t handlebars have a more comfortable flat spot in drop down curvature?”  And to learning their and industry answer that it won’t fit through handle bar stem if not curved just so, like.  And then as well to querying near:  “What do you is new and in development that might be out in a few years?” This so and when 12 speeds was reported the most number of gears that could be fit on a road bike before such would work against itself and wear out or wear down too quickly as of riding with too much friction and twisting.  I did learn from professional mechanic that had bikes that cost more than his used van and for racing where he might, with their team, at least, that someone somewhere was then starting to work on a design for brake levers that could also be gear shifters, and all this while it was still our early or by then mid 80s.  I forget which year Demi Moore wore cycling shorts to the Oscars, though, and do not know how she hooked up with a Kutcher as to cycling Kutch is the Indian region most of the chamois in the cycling shorts derived from.

I did use social media to communicate a Connecticut invite to Representative Ron Paul and to ride out to an old haunt that worked me always towards a competitiveness with Kennedy Camelot as well as a business ethics and marketing set, mental to considerations that I had client(s) who made the living and held their most esteemedness as “Best” in nation in their field with lances as so scalpels are.  I was again to careful selection of Japanese Shimano 600ex groupo equiped Panasonic racing/touring designed ride and so as to balancing a dominance in cycling by Campagnolo.  I did dream that America and Americans would have its own pride of high end racing components sooner, if not later.  I did even return to shop weeks after my mentioned question of days long ago before handlebars looks generally now so admiral as they do now, and, with a stem from a childs bike I had been working on to be visibly of a pointed presentation to suggest that such could be a four screw method for new racing and road stems to allow a turn from traditional and too Campy reliance on old molded single screw fascination.  And, that to racers it could be sold as lighter - or at least likely lighter.

I lost track of so much of this cycling focus as a primary focus for over a decade,  when I moved then away from even the borrowed truing stand proximity of New Haven, I was already musing for Harry Potter development as to a mass market promised potential to make JK very rich, and so as such before she had much more than notes on napkins to challenge to write seven books that so in early years when she regularly of “it just came to me - I don’t know where from.” (like - as is “paraphrased”).  See I realized since I was musing to such for a posse of young neighbors also of my neighborhood bike mechanic clientelle and for the one I then nick-named “Peter Rowe-ling” when I was preparing to move away and as if the small posse all the also “Rowe-lings” to have an umbrella of professionalism maintained in part better by creatively covering and blocking with nick-naming patriarchal to them under “Peter’s” real grandfather “Pete Rowe.”  I realized as a muse to such I had best to avoid being the anal bike and bike maintenance enthusiast I had been - and focus on lighter and more entertaining thoughts to marketing a more global developmental that their parents would find entertaining and be surprised by.

A couple years ago I broke away from this once thought better practice and general to more admiral thought and got back in the saddle - my not too worn out Avocet Racing III once mail ordered from Palo Alto as an upgrade to go with my “ricey” Sakae Road Champion racing handlebars that as well was carefully chosen to be better for my riding purposes and interest in being a quiet ambassador for American cycling and competitiveness.   Now though, my old Olympic thoughts to American cycling that once was more 1980 centric as of a Russian or USSR concern tend to have me thinking of Sakae still like RICE and yet to memories more recent from having been the contractor hired to install new closet doors years ago in Watergate for NSA Condoleezza Rice.

And so re: CYCLING:  When thinking otherwise of carpentry tools and those of STANLEY gifted me by my maternal grandfather once a top New York Madison Ave “Mad Man” I would balance thoughts of Stanley Greenberg, another neighbor, but away from cycling as I could while his daughters were of my swim team and youth group - my high school circle, like.

And so re:  CYCLING:  If you want to ride fast - as fast as road racers like Lance - you may have to practice, practice, and practice, and look to associate with the best equipment and marketing teams - you may though have to join a race to race or just ride as fast for you to be so quick may need as well to have roads dedicated and closed but for your use.

And so re:  CYCLING:  When I got back in my old saddle a couple years ago I did ride enough that year to finally wear out my old saddle - an to near old haunts that I would ride out with Rep Ron Paul if occasion arose, where I did ride again that year when accumulating at least near 1,400 miles turned out near old Camelot road concerns.  To ride fast, again, you may need to enter a race — Where I grew up riding I could find a long hill to ride down, a mostly quiet road of rolling low hills with light traffic and think about moments possibly available to ride down one hill and then speed up the next, and in this case a steeper but shorter next hill then just after a small side street of Camelot Courts of Guinivere & Kennedy literary haunting at the road I think was and is called Lancelot Road (or Lane).  But so, if you do want to ride fast and as fast as racers you may need roads to be closed for I have nearly no memories of this old still haunting ride where I was free to ride down one hill at full speed and up the other without that rare car being leaving Camelot and with a rolling stop characteristic of back roads or another car topping next hill with its signal on for left turn across my path or with turned planned without signaling, and then there was usually sand at side street that had to be considered while considering that neither cars leaving Camelot via Lancelot tended to fully stop or at least until across my lane and stopped to double check that a car wasn’t suddenly appearing from over nearby hill while both then of limited sight lines for fair consideration of cycling enthusiasts.

When the yet undiscovered Martian lives arrive - will if of space travel not be predators and be more missionary and friendly?


[What I learned from competitors of Eric Heiden back whence was that pro-cyclists went out before races for warm-up rides as long as I then considered a full ride.  I did appreciate this back whence when self motivating to century tour with packs (panniers) full of near extra thirty pounds up to and back from Berkshire campiness mine for YMCA camp Alumni Weekends, twice.  I did appreciate this a couple years ago as I got to serious road touring locally with enough 10-60 mile day rides to amount to near 1,400 total miles for that year - and so to physicality that brings knowledge that after first 45-60 minutes riding just gets easier, not harder, though “tiring” can become a concern.]

                                                             * *

{Lance Armstrong — I did manage to get bike so mentioned out at least once a year, at that when so did tend to be on or near the last day of French tour.  I should figure out now this new “Live Strong” cycling atmosphere now that I did already refresh and share old memories that thought a better priority if now back to training for years more of riding.  Please, again, pass on my thoughts and greetings to Eric Heiden - he is still working as team physician for BMC and with American Olympic hopefuls, yes?}

                                            * * *

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 1:24 pm

I was going to title these thoughts for this column THE BOUNCING BALL but then I realized I was reaching, and so reaching back that it was raising the concern of Clintons’ years that they were “yellow” most of their 8.

We have clearly with President Barack Hussein Obama orated erudity in acceptance of his Nobel Peace Prize the barb and warning of dangers of “inaction” and “avoidance” (as of near all eight years of the Clintons) a factual suggestion very publicly heralded, as if “source one” only needing one more to confirm.

Today we have so much that isn’t adding up - these days we have stories and claims that when presented vastly as a summation seem vast void of sufficient variables and constants.  It may be easier, and yet short of “yellow journalism” to say that Clintons were both “green” and “yellow” during their 8.

It isn’t “yellow journalism” to suggest that President William Jefferson Clinton with his Clinton Global Initiative has been trying to live an outsourcing of some to too much that long has been considered a perk and easy duty for our office holders of our Presidency.  It is as if CGI is a clear attempt as maintained to run privately part of our office of the President as if the People agreed it should be outsourced and with wisdom of term limits left to blow in their winds.

Our President Clinton is years now of behaving with CGI contrary to his promises to be non-partisan and non-political with such — we now have Newt Gingrich of contracts with “Chief Lobbyist” to compare and contrast with Bill Clinton as of the similar excesses to loose legalisms like blatant loopholes for a few so that we should be asking how Bill Clinton’s “not” political is actually still almost as political as any political endeavors past or present. 

President Clinton is more “in politics” and as a very partisan actor than Newt Gingrich is or has ever been a “lobbyist”?

President Clinton had many sympathetic figures about him - male and female - after having to disembark from the Clintons’ grand public housing that is our White House and so it seems to coddling and organizing to figure a way to let him find a way to gather and hold extra-officially and agovernmentally as much money power and influence his friends could manage, and so in the days they were it appears selling our Constitution as out of date and inappropriate for the cult of personality global dictates whimsy had some thinking better - and excusable if due to “CRISIS.”

President Clinton may have seen this consecrated around him and for him in ways that kept him from accepting the fate and wisdom of our term limits - but it isn’t so much to how it was conceived but how he is abusing it in daily practice almost always turned to a partisan and political, especially when he has his near mandatory annual meeting set to overshadow United Nations gatherings and has soaked up new domestic and global energy with interviews and those so near all with partisan and political turning of biased phrasing.

As practiced it is arguable that since our Constitution has been determined already to have a real relevance still it seems President Clinton with CGI is apparently practicing an un-Constitutionality and one thought to become excusable due to “CRISIS” convenient storification, partisan and political.  We have a contrast there for reporting of how CGI isn’t being run as it was promised to be run, and especially about the times of mandatory attendance by globally significant leaders scheduled so to duel with importance of current USA administration and also the entire United Nations.

As it is being run we may all be being put at risk and with our standard checks and balances.  Past lesser meddling by thought retired politicians not as of willful serious attempts to appear not as term limited but as if promoted out of and above our office of the President brings us to a due consideration that our very few applicable checks and balances are now undermined and violated - we have it a ridiculous condition of this current politics that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is our fine line of over-sight with duty to attempt to probe and scrutinize Mr. William Jefferson Clinton.   Our Secretary of State is our officer responsible (so I heard) of checking balances and all “commitments” of spirit and coordination of CGI - and specifically to confirm that non of such is intentionally or accidentally then to dangerous supporting “materially supporting” of terrorism.

I know as you look back at this bureaucratic mess we have that the Clintons’ Global Initiative was operating like wise during the Bush 8 - that to suggest this as bad and of a meddling now suggests that President Clinton likewise was interfering and meddling globally contrary to the Bush administrations efforts then, and then as motivated with means and opportunity specific to goal to first be first husband and wife both elected and so of a practical need to find a way even then to avoid surrendering all the power our 22nd Amendment was meant to limit.

We have President Barack Hussein Obama’s orated erudity of his warnings within his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech as a partial condemnation of the Clintons for like of a “yellowness” of their 8 - and one now regularly confused as we are spooned out that we are to celebrate the Clintons as if “Bill” the “Dove” and “Hillary” the “Hawk” naturally though of a pathology traceable as a machination worked as if spinning and handling of public thems different from private thems.

Sure if their case that America actually needed to surrender its reliance on its Constitution and embrace their suppositions and subscriptions to a need now from CRISIS to become more of a cult of personality even if such meant more “government by man” than “by law” - then we could now be celebrating both Clintons and now raking them deservedly now over coals.

Never before have a past First Couple, it seems, both deserved to be separated and questioned and even maybe waterboarded with at least as much to be learned as from those we have considered such due already before and so as appropriate, historically, so far.

There is still a lot for them to explain from early nineties that has been credited to them that hasn’t yet been deserved or factually accurate or of an intellectual honesty so with whence.  It shouldn’t take “yellow journalism” or waterboarding to break this out of them - an new nationalism in a reset Constitutionalism might flush it out all by itself.

                                        * * *

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 8:18 pm

In the memories and reflexology of some like Jack Welch are some interesting and now critical past experiences of an old battle from our early 1990s.

John F. Akers, former CEO of IBM is another touched by a time and internal battle that most of America little still considers.  It was a war within America for the heart and soul of America and one almost not fought in our boardrooms then, whence.

I want your memories too Mr. Louis V. Gerstner and even maybe Catherine Black - I am remembering an old “oh, don’t you dare” utterance near scream from me that predates a rallying of the likes of our Business Roundtable to take back some statements and reverse course.

Mr. Welch, I know you have these memories and likely with a recently renewed awareness of my presence in such from afar - afar as New Haven, CT was and is, still.

I do feel I would be most responsible to recall and reconstruct a timeline with players, places and times affixed properly and substantially.

I do not remember when Clintons became a part of this battle to save a near surrendering, or that they had any significant contribution or that they weren’t a part of the problem from within too before we effected a back step and change of course that had American top CEOs walk away from earlier public statements, and with John F. Akers of IBM maybe the first of such.

Please collect yourselves, and your thoughts and memories of the early nineties, I could use such and America deserves still an better informing as to this old battle that almost was lost before it was even fought - that battle that became a united effort to only say America needed a new American management spirit and methodology and not what had first been near the surrendered to.

This is all relevant to 2012 because it again goes to so much that public give both Clintons credit for too much and as time has proven them hardly likely deserving of such for of judgement since quite inconsistent and years without successful repeating of depth or quality of once then quickly adjusted economic and corporate think and practices.  My memory is they were part of the problem naturally and willingly before becoming just like a silent partner to a grand portion of political good, not so silent about any economic good being creditable as theirs, though.

Please, those all who were involved, and especially Mr. Welch, Mr. Akers and Mr. Gerstner, please stir your memories of such years now hopefully not too long ago so that they all feel alive again with the old about face step back and turn from first steps towards telling all of America that they now needed to become Japanese, more Japanese, to learn the Japanese “team” management obedience as if their lives depended on it.

It may help to remember that this remembered about face that had me first to “oh, don’t you dare” like, and then to a responsibility to show you that an American RESET was possible and more proper and patriotic and actually much better for business was then shortly before the Asian or Japanese break out of bird flu.  There was no way my earlier shared new marketing synthesis that was of and for a decentralization was needing a Japanese management teamwork obedience - and it was but a lot more work then to consider and share the still American way that was stronger and freer and much still available.

Please your memories are wanted - and as ALIVE anew as you can manage.  I may be important now to actually determine how much the Clintons had naturally been part of the problem before they too managed some to become part of something more of an American renaissance - but I am thinking future leaders are better to be prepared if they can actually learn properly of a war that really was fought, and nearly not, back in early 1990s and for the heart and soul of America.

[I was stirred to remembering more with the columns that now seem to follow this that do actually predate it but so as the storification goes - I was to wondering anew how or why I may have been to enough corporate exposure to be to the remembered “put it to fixing up TIME SQUARE & LAS VEGAS…”]

Please, all that helped turn American corporate leaders from the near surrender to an unnecessary acceptance of a think that America then had to learn to become Japanese, remember, please remember, even if before you became a hero of such you were first nearly a _______________. 

Please, and yes as ALIVE as you can manage and with as many of the involved players, places and times. 

America may need you know as you were and as you are.  Our next President deserves a chance to live in a political world a little more realistic and understandable. 

It was a war that was fought within, a war that almost wasn’t fought at all.  Our early 1990s were a mess in so many ways and ways of resentments from old wars lost as well as confusion in new wars or operations unfinished, as well as that America was facing competition in quite remarkable ways worth emulating but for that emulating wasn’t needed or best when a strong and freer American renaissance of sorts was still a viable and available option.

[No, you should not wait to see a story of me for having shown up to work, anywhere, with a bed for in bedding, as embedding an accepted and sufficient lure.  That, would seem trite today - I do try to avoid being trite, still.]

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 11:41 am

This is not a treehugger piece about the spotted owl.  For myself it was of our endangerment near the end of the Persian Gulf War with Time Square and Las Vegas then as “Achilles Heels” our very own.

A lot exciting is happening now.

It is still a toss up as to which party was in the early nineties when such as two “Achilles Heels” existed in America and globally as American more want and tracked towards partisan dangers - a partisan pride to an economy like now but in a more dangerous time.

I didn’t write a personal memoir or publish a book of my “dreams” while nearly still a student - this may not be the most advisable first steps - it may be less advisable now to be one of their twenties of a life memoir, it seems.  Again I did not scribe a memoir in early nineties when hardly past “student.”

Now though, while still four years younger than one such and to the day, the same August day, I sit this morning thinking it now more important to reassociate with parties of our nineties towards a timely reconstruction of events and developments as they occurred.  I sit this morning thinking something now more towards a memoir is better and more vital now than jumping aboard any political campaign.

We have political hazards of our early nineties like how Senator Al Gore stirred a near Constitutional CRISIS when and how he did announce as likely top Dem candidate that he wouldn’t run - and that he was thinking he should because President Bush “deserves a second term.”

We have political and religious hazards as concerning then that were of the end of Cold War and fall of Berlin Wall while of wrapping up Persian Gulf War (prematurely?) that was specific to a Republican Party dangerous PRIDE.  We have that a Conservative Coalition (Christian Coalition) was then dominant and more so than a re-elected more moderate President Bush could check and balance in coming years.  We still have problem that was of Christian Coalition to an excessive political pride towards a near:  America won Cold War only because it was a conservative and Christian State.

The last place now to look for useful answers to so much of the early nineties and days before Clintons a party’s nominee or even before they were an announced “two-fer” candidacy.  This is more of private industry and evil corporate people seeing important things to do and doing them, publicly but quietly.

It is fair to suggest that Time Square and Las Vegas make-overs that happened so much in early 90s would have happened and just as well if not better if President Bush had been re-elected.  I haven’t written a memoir yet - I still have to dig down to remember players, places and times - now is a time calling me to such as more important than entwining in a campaign.

We have to hold now more self evident that Saddam Hussein may have seen the Democrats as a more useful weapon against their own America than the rude pride then of a less checked Christian Coalition towards a possible useful domestic imbalance if President Bush had been re-elected.

Thoughts of showing up at Hearst with a flat bed with a bed in back to begin a physical in bedding has long been an element of my maybe better once clearly compartmentalized media ambitions about our Fourth Estate.  To be so long as “Citizen Rosebud” as since days in 1983 after watching CITIZEN KANE and considerate to my own networks was to be one in defense of such media house and not against it, passed friends could tell of how their father once ran such company in years the founder that once in NY acquired “Hogan’s Alley” - William Randolph Hearst - was passing.  Here again a memoir effort would help sort out players, places and times — time maybe to become a philanthropist - time to look for endowments, maybe to such.

It is now maybe our greatest dangers to confuse so much that was great of our early nineties and of positive change at least in New York and Nevada as actually due to the Clintons campaigning and/or governance.  Again, much of this was started before they could hop up on such wave and ride it sloppily or haphazardly.  We have to contrast now the fate of Governor Andrew Cuomo now busy trying to unlearn and then learn a new way different from his and Clintons’ governance methodology of nineties, necessarily.

President Barack Hussein Obama has inherited from his own party too limited an understanding of Clintons’ actual capability and historical significance.  He did not inherit the mess for our politics and economy that comes from his pride and ignorance about his pronouncements about Operation Iraqi Freedom - that is his own vulnerability of his own dangerous assumptions - but for an ignorance of efforts of evil corporate types back in early 90s to fix our TIME SQUARE and LAS VEGAS before they were used globally and at least by Saddam Hussein against us all.  S.H. likely did think that our Democrats were his best weapon against us, then there about in his dreaming of ways to take and keep Kuwait as his booty - he seemed at least confident he had a winning global public relations case to make against the United States of America and in part due to how bad some parts of our cities were if not entire cities. 

What has been happening since suggests both Clintons still lack the sufficient creativity and or experience to have been enough of such with understanding to be wise enough to be of such still now.

I have not flip-flopped as Hillary Clinton did about Operation Iraqi Freedom - I have been for such as necessary and likely unavoidable ever since their first term — I as well though didn’t read the national intelligence estimates about such as she is reported to have avoided before voting - but then I didn’t vote nor was I privy officially to such classified publications.

If more people don’t know how evil corporate types helped expedite moving of urban mountains as happened in extra-governmental ways maybe agovernmental then now they are likely not to have enough factual and relevant information to form intelligent opinions and specific decisions.  We, again, have that the Clintons may be the last any should ask about such.

I know I had the ears of members of The Business Roundtable - and deans and Presidents of universities - I had been giving free ideas towards an integrated positive change, a rapid change as then seeming prudent, and again, as to it being as likely to work for a re-elected President Bush if such the peoples decision while voting largely uninformed.  I do have to consider it time to compile depth for such years to dig up players, places and times - it seems more important now that joining a campaign or just covering the races.  Due to my past intellectual involvement and past arms length distance kept during such I am now not necessarily the right player for a few more years - as I will be looking and looking until then for enough activity reset in American by Americans and to which levels of governance refreshed or re-tasked about so much. 

I know I had leverage with NBC from TV show idea sharing and anchoring for creative character and plot developments and as well with IBM and yet so busy about such so concerning and of thoughts of arriving at Hearst with a bed that getting parties that could have paid me a whole lot were thought better to be asked to dedicate much instead towards remodeling of TIME SQUARE and LAS VEGAS as our best starting points after basis set and checked in and with New Haven.  But I do really have to now spend time checking and digging down to remember players, places and times - and how much I joined and how much I led.  

Again, the Clintons are probably the last people needed to be checked with about so much of this that was to be there for a re-elected President Bush.  Before we went into Baghdad to collect Saddam Hussein for a judgement of his peers in a prosecution if not by a new Nuremberg like global review we had first to fix that we and our cities were in such disrepair that we had to fix ourselves before we could attempt to stand with and help Iraqi majorities at least attend to Baghdad post Saddam Hussein.

But I really am just now feeling free to dig deep to remember how much wasn’t really the Clintons, as now long thought.  I have that I was wired with James E. Burke by effort kept up respecting my maternal grandfathers last years of his own career as a Madison Ave top “Mad Man” for such as per his Johnson & Johnson marketing and advertizing needs and hopes.  I know as well that James E. Burke fired IBM CEO & CFO as per boards wishes and led search committee the picked Louis V. Gerstner Jr. and with a special confidence that most of changes that IBM had then needed to quickly make it had managed to adjust to before Akers & Metz actually turned over charges to Gerstner and his.

A lot exciting is happening now - and yet most may not have enough critical historical knowledge to understand enough.  Once past creating a basis in a “back to basics” in New Haven it is remembered now some that thoughts that TIME SQUARE and LAS VEGAS were maybe our most critical nexts.

Yes, it seems to be an accurate memory that Saddam Hussein thought our Democrats could be used and played well enough by him with his global public relations trickery and acumen so to be used much against us as they then were a set.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 1:14 pm

To be standing today with a political future you likely had to know how to bob and weave through the nineties.

My term for myself during such trying decade is often as “cross partisan” - it may be best that I avoid saying I was “bi-partisan” or “partisan” as such could be as confusing as it was when I heard Senator Biden in New Haven of the nineties say that Federalism was “devolving.”

President Biden may actually have said “Federalism was evolving” while participating in symposium on the evolution or devolution of Federalism - it is still hard figuring - hard figuring a combination of “evolution” or “devolution” with “Federalism” especially as legal talk.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has years post her new “travel office” duties quite secretarial to judge herself and near as poorly and honestly as many of us will - especially for effrontery to Federalism.

It may all come down - come down soon to that they didn’t collaborate - not really as rivals and really not as politicians to a bi-partisan or “cross partisan.”

I still will have the Clintons four years from 1993 to 1996 to hold in a most critical contempt and with criticism - I have said we all would be better off today if the Clintons had not been re-elected.  There first steps of just first new year and first year set us up and to such “devolution” or “evolution” - dependent on your perspective of our Federalism.

President Biden may actually have said this is all mostly the fault of the Clintons - he didn’t have to weave such a partisan “evolution” defense while of his “devolution” perspective.  He, again, is of and from our First State.  I am of and from our Constitution State.  The first year of the Clinton administration is enough for most if looking for political moves to be critical of as of an early and root causation for these times.

Not even half of her remaining friends in Hollywood were able to help her with her “I ducked and ran for cover” her early and wrongness about her of an “I … ran”

Nominee Mitt Romney seems to have the footwork still to not just spar with Majority Leader Senator Reid but to bob and weave and knock him out.  I forget if it was in the Clintons first year or the year before where I was party to the think for positive change I was walking and talking so that IBM was asked to participate while of a partial usage and towards helping remodel Time Square and Las Vegas.

There is a lot Hillary Clinton hasn’t done - this alone can keep many busy for years for in a negative it is positively a negative - there is much to do about her “nothing” moments.  There are as well many collaborations between spouses of Clinton “two-fer” that too limited “collaboration” to selfish politics and running, as now fodder for them of a fading - a political public polite perishing — polite = kept civil exiting.

Speaking with some self awareness - I realize as per me as of a “Constitutional” I as per lacking erudity am one now maybe of having from decades of trying “cross partisan” participation may be as per memory as one whom has forgotten more than he might ever remember he forgot - quite possibly - Please don’t ask me to explain the Constitution - it is easier to make an example, practical of the Clintons.

President Biden and Scottish existentialist Newt Gingrich could start a morning call in show soon.

Former Secretary Hillary Clinton has decades to defend her ravaging now a couple decades so.

Not necessarily in defense of Nominee Mitt Romney - we have that he has bobbed and weaved better than Hillary has actually run.  To be standing today a midst these issues as a politician that survived the most trying and difficult nineties a Massachusetts “Governor” may most have needed how to bob.  It is kinda unfair to Evangelist Barack H. Obama that he believe it was as easy to be President as some made it look for Sopranos star William Jefferson Clinton and made it seem for him as well.  That isn’t quite our reality though showing still much for our nineties.

Have you ever gotten a laugh out of a Boston cop?  Have you ever had a Massachusetts Municipal chieftain tell you not to laugh?  Did you like his name - as for his cop work - his “Bill” and his “Bratton” and decide to quietly collaborate - even proactively for positive change?  You can consider that IBM committing to help remodel Time Square did coincide with William Brattons careful and politically difficult New York City collaborations of old - It may be best that the two are never separated, scholastically speaking to future erudities.

Some where there are records that President Biden could easily find - I did hear him and meet him near 1996 or 97 while still staying of a consideration for the well namedness of Chief Bratton - it was in New Haven then at the Joseph Slifka Center at Yale for a symposium open to public hosted by his son’s class then of Yale Law School.  I was still an enrolled student at Suffolk Law School when Chief Bratton newly to Massachusetts’ most dilapidated state wide police force suggested I not laugh at his new very old fleet.

Former Chief William Bratton’s old mentor Dean Esserman became a New Haven neighbor before he became a beat cop - a trained and passable cadet to be both an esquire deputy and a trained regular.  I here he is now back in New Haven - that Dean Esserman may already now be New Haven’s newest sworn Chief.

Oh, did she run!  Oh, boy did she run!  Oh my - she really should not have been of “I ran” even as just of her run.

By even just the end of the first year of the Clintons’ Presidency they were working to a collaboration to make others collaborations for positive change and a more global and level “Federalism” really an “Anti-Federalism” work for fewer - and more selfishly and politically for them and their (autocrat) dreamin’.

I still have no clue or conclusiveness on the intent of “Federalism is devolving” for alone it sounds too good to be true though otherwise maybe orated.  Does “Federalism is devolving” in an evolutionary sense mean it as an intellectual accomplishment and governance body politic returning to its fine roots?  Anyone?  I mean like our Bill of Rights as “TEN” is a harkening to the TEN COMMANDMENTS and furtherance upon and afterwards from the Articles preamble with it of an “ordaining” usage then concluded with “subscribing” … “in the Year of our Lord…” — it seems that we have our first “TEN” as if meant to be a parlay of commandments as RIGHTS and Power of the People to ways just to protect self and property from all violating TEN COMMANDMENTS.

I don’t know what to say now about President Biden — Nominee Mitt Romney may have been less of “flip-flopping” than a near impossible bob and weave existence throughout our terrible and trying nineties, and as if a survivor and better boxing champion than Majority Leader Senator Harry Reid.

{If you are to or were to asking Retired Chief William Bratton about me - he may tell you of emails I sent him while he was chieftain in Los Angeles and how he laughed, it seemed when the Bostonian he is realized reading me that I had been “taking on the Kennedys” and maybe even in keeping with my long spirit of collaboration to all the positive change I attempted to encourage as if of an “invisible hand” that as well stirs a memory near college graduation about the time the FBI named its new training town “Hogan’s Alley” if I might be looking to join their esprit de corps.  I am not nor have I ever been a government employee - I was of such opinion and expression purposeful to an otherwise yet as good to work also to better if and when possible thence.  Hmmm!  That ran on a little — If you speak to Retired Chief William Bratton he likely remembers as well that I emailed consideration that with election of Democrat to White House he should protect his life’s work and legacy and look to retire from public duty and maybe shift to private enterprise.  I was of opinion now quite proven correct that Democrats were going to do great damage to the economy - I did not think it would be fair that any increase in crime from such would then be able to be scapegoated on to likes of Chief Bratton - as if it were a policing not a national political problem.}

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 12:40 am

[A copy of a college philosophy course paper of mine - not sure I gave the expected or popular analysis and/or answers to assignment - yet do think I still hold this opinion as then conceived as mine - I am though now posting this before re-reading it - having re-read it even recently.  Don’t at the moment remember the name of the course then while at Villanova in mid eighties - I acquired an undeclared Philosophy Minor - got the credits for minor without registering such intent or achievement within Philosophy Department bureaucracy.  (This had many pages - I think I pasted all of them here.)]

                BY: J PETER HOGAN

Plato, Machiavelli, Marx and Fanon all spoke about ideal
societies in the form of relatively small communities.  Does
this mean there can be no utopias on the global scale?  or,
were they just limited by their time and environment?  Today we
are concerned about global societies.  Our primary concern is
the path of international relations:  How the hundreds of
nations in the world can and will relate peacefully.  We are
striving for world peace while we also strive to improve our
ability to destroy our world.  World peace is a slow process
and cannot and will not occur until all nations have a common
link.  I believe the threat of global destruction is not enough
itself, that something else is also needed, something tied to
everyday life.  The market is such a thing; the international
market is unifying the world.  The industrial giants have
gotten away with some atrocities yet still they have
successfully done more to further world peace than any other
body.  The atrocities occurred because these firms were
breaking new grounds which existing laws were inadequate to
control;  there were not internationally accepted laws
protecting the rights and property of all human beings as
equals.  Today an international body is needed to establish a
global justice system.  As more and more nations begin to
compete in the international market, general principles of
proper and acceptable behavior must be agreed upon and
practiced.  These also must be enforceable.

I propose to study how these philosophers saw their ideal societies
as well as show how and why some are realistic and others will
remain dream  I will also explain how I see the path of
international relations with a view towards future utopias, and
will show that only one of these four philosophers presented a
plan for society that when applied to the real world can work
efficiently and peacefully in the international arena.

Plato’s republic can be seen as the forerunner to
capitalistic society.  In the REPUBLIC each person is
encouraged to pursue his own interests and to specialize in
this interest in order to maximize his happiness and the
society’s well being.  This very closely resembles Adam Smith’s
justification of the free market system with his “invisible
hand principle.”  The theme is identical while the motives for
the individuals are expressed differently.  Socrates wanted the
individual motivated solely by his love for his art, not for
material gain nor for the acquisition of wealth.  In the
REPUBLIC Socrates set up a city which had not been “bloated by
the fever,” but instead remained a very plain community,
content with subsistence level existence.  Even the rulers of
the city refrain from luxuries and fancy foods.  Socrates
believed that wealth as well as poverty was detrimental to the
community, so he eliminated them from his ideal society.  As an
ideal society we do not necessarily expect it to match natural
human tendencies.  Socrates refused to admit a human desire for
private property.  I can understand his efforts to omit this
since it seems that most wars have occurred over questions of
property rights;  the have-nots wishing to acquire the goods of
the haves.  If we go back to Socrates’ ideal society and
recognize materialism as a natural human tendency, then what we
have is a capitalistic society.  Each individual would be
motivated not only by the love of his art but also by his
desire to increase his possessions, leaving society to be
controlled by the pursuit of individuals’ self interest.  This
can only peacefully occur where there are well defined and
accepted laws governing property rights.  Still, as in the
REPUBLIC, justice would be the minding of your own business but
might be extended to include the minding of your own property
and respect for the property of others.  Plato was not alone in
his omission of the human desire for private property;  many
other philosophers have done the same.

Machiavelli, however, did not omit human materialism.  The
prince was a wise man solely because he understood some basic
principles about human nature and about the nature of the
masses.  Machiavelli, in THE PRINCE, wrote not as a
philosopher about how things ought to be but as a political
scientist about how things were.  His prince realized that the
majority of people have very simple desires and that as long as
a ruler could satisfy these desires he would be able to
maintain control.  He realized that most people actually desire
to be ruled so that they themselves don’t have to worry about
the everyday issues of controlling a society.  They just want
to concentrate on their own desires, their immediate self
interests.  The combination of these two facts leaves a ruler
a lot of leeway to do what he wishes.  As long as the ruler
protected the rights of his subjects, they would be willing to
do his work, work his lands to produce products which he could
sell for his personal profit.  The prince got wealth off the
labor of his subjects; he had title to the resources, the land,
and traded with his subjects for their labor.  Of course he
owned the land on which they lived and the homes in which they
lived, so this he considered as part of their wages while the
other parts of it were the food they ate, the protection he
provided, and the justice he enforced among his subjects.  The
Prince will be able to keep his subjects content as long as
their limited desires can be met; but, when technology and
invention create new products to tempt their desires the task
becomes more difficult because they will all desire to increase
their standard of living.  If the prince cannot satisfy their
new desires then he will most likely have to resort to fear to
keep them in line, and can do so because he controls their
rights.  Fear is, according to the prince, the most effective
way of keeping people in line.  Fear will always be a means of
effecting human behavior, while ideally we wish it wouldn’t be.
Ideally, we would like respect to be the only true motivator.
But, unfortunately it is not.  As a result we must make and
accept laws which will protect the rights of the people and
their property.  We should not ignore or dismiss the human
tendency to desire property and increased comfort.  When such
is done a realistic picture is not possible.

Karl Marx, for example, based his whole community on the
premise of public property.  It takes a revolution to bring
about his “communistic ideals.”  A revolt by the”have-nots”
against the “haves.”  The have-nots revolt because the
possessions and rights of the haves are protected while their
rights are ignored.  There is obviously an imbalance of power
and wealth.  Marx saw the solution as a revolution in which the
haves are over thrown and all capital possessions are entrusted
to the society as a whole.  Marx too ignored the human desire
to possess property.  His ideal falls apart after the
revolution when some of the revolutionaries, usually the
stronger use their might to obtain for themselves the
possessions conquered.  It usually turns out that the new
capitalists, who were the leaders of the revolt, used the
revolution solely to achieve personal wealth.  Is this much
different than before the revolution?  No, because it is the
same play but with a different cast and the price of the change
includes the lives of many.  Marx envisioned an altruistic
government; one that had the responsibility of making sure that
everyone was doing what they were best at, while also making
sure that everyone got equal pay.  Marx failed to admit that
the individuals know best their own interests and abilities and
that they should pick their own career from those offered in
the society.  Marx saw equal distribution of wealth as the
answer to property disputes.  Yet, this can only succeed where
all individuals desire the same things and have some other very
powerful motivation to do their best in their endeavors.
Usually it requires promises of great returns to motivate
people and empty promises can only work a few times.  Attempts
to actualize his ideal society has failed.  They have put the
ownership of capital in the hands of the public, in very loose
terms.  The wealthy class previously were the owners of capital
and the means of production but now are the new controllers of
the means of production, the government.  The general populace
usually becomes worse off;  they no longer participate in a
Society focused on the individuals’ interests.  Instead of
having a competitive state they have a monopolistic state.
Marx’s ideals and observations did little in the long run to
greatly improve the well being of its subjects.  Where it has
been attempted it has been corrupted.

Frantz Fanon was confronted with oppression and wealth
inequality problems in Algeria.  The colonized state was
experiencing greatly uneven wealth distribution; the natives
were very poor and becoming worse off while the settlers were
getting even wealthier.  Ideally this should never have
occurred to such an extent.  The natives’ rights would have
been protected.  If this had been the case any development in
country would necessarily have been approved by the leaders
among the natives.  The natives would have most likely demanded
payment for land desired by the settlers.  If this had been the
case the revolution would not have been necessary because the
settlers would have been there with the consent of the natives.
This obviously did not happen, and did not happen because the
natives had a lifestyle with very simple laws and the settlers
came from a society with very complex laws and one that saw
peoples like the Algerian natives as barbaric and uneducated.
I propose, however, that even with these differences in culture
had the settlers made reasonable deals with the natives to
fairly reimburse them for land and labor the natives would have
grown to accept and coexist with the settlers.  This would
necessarily have occurred if there were internationally
enforceable human rights and property rights for all alike.
Instead the natives were exploited and excluded to the point
where their only option was revolution.  This was the surest
way to educate the mass of natives about the ways of the
settlers.  The natives would have to understand their foe
before they could beat them.  As we know from reading THE
WRETCHED OF THE EARTH, the end results of the revolution were
primarily negative: The economy was worse off; many people
were dead; and now the native elite were exploiting the masses,
as the settlers had done before them.  The few positive aspects
were that the native population had been brought together under
a common cause through which they were educated about
themselves and the settlers and through which they gained
national character.  Education is the first major step to
realizing equality and freedom.  Fanon saw the struggle as a
third world nation against an industrialized nation.  Algeria,
however, did not gain control over the industrial nation but
instead regained some control over itself.  Algeria cannot win
this battle against oppression until all property rights are
protected and property transfers are left to the open market,
where the buyer and seller will have to reach a mutually
acceptable deal.

Following what Machiavelli had to say most people are
content working for other people, as long as they are treated
fairly and respected as human beings.  As Plato also believed
some people are naturally referred to be the rulers, not
everyone, nor most people have the inclination to rule.
Recognizing these as realities leaves every society, past and
present, with the dilemma of class systems.  Marx tried to
avoid this by having an equal distribution of wealth.  In the
real world this does not work; people like to be paid according
to the amount of work performed, not less.  Some people prefer
to work more and harder than others there will be uneven wealth
distribution, due to human nature.  Some people start preparing
for the future at an earlier age and are thus better prepared
to succeed when their time comes.  Others who only played as
children may be limited to being laborers for the rest of their
lives.  After generations some families will be better off
because they have consistently prepared for the future and now
as a result have many more opportunities than families who have
not.  The inequality of opportunity then is an accumulation of
behaviors and influences over time.  Yet, for those whose
opportunities were effectively limited through exploitation,
such as the slaves, steps should be taken to try to increase
their class’s opportunities, to partially balance out the jump
the exploiters got on them.  We must be sure, however, to
ensure that it will still be up to the individual to improve
his own position and the future position of his descendants.
Yet still we will be left with a concentration of wealth by a
minority.  The difference between each society then is left to
the structure of its government.

Monarchies, as we saw in THE PRINCE, keep the wealth among
the rulers.  The government has absolute control over its
subjects because that is what they truly are: their subjects.
The peasants had no means of recourse for evil or harmful acts
by their master; their masters chose what rights they had.
Attempts to actualize Marx’s ideals have turned out no better
than monarchies.  Here there was a larger government which
still held control over the citizens.  The government lived off
the labor of the citizens as the monarchs had done.  In both
these cases it is interesting to realize that the rulers often
resorted to fear to keep the citizens in line.  These problems
cannot be resolved until the interests of the masses are
represented in government.  Concentration of wealth is natural
and acceptable as long as the wealthy do not control the
government.  It is necessary, however, that the government not
only look after the welfare of the citizens but that they
also look after the interest of the society to see that
businesses thrive in a competitive market.  Where competition
cannot feasibly exist the government would regulate the
monopolistic industry to keep it from exploiting the masses.
Ideally, government’s responsibilities should be limited strictly
to the establishment and enforcement of human and property
rights.  Other responsibilities of government as we know it
today would not be necessary.  The market would control these
through the voices of the educated consumers, while the
government is left responsible for guaranteeing the rights of
its citizens.

When we look at different forms of government we should
remember their fundamental purpose: The protection of the
people and their rights.  All governments recognize this, yet
some only affirm and protect a select few rights.  Societies
were formed for the benefit of individuals.  The individuals of
the society determine its success or failure through their
efforts, production, and behavior.  History shows that a
society’s success is directly related to the degree of freedoms
enjoyed by the individual citizens.  Where citizens have
freedom of choice and their property rights are protected we
have seen economic success.  Governments, such as in Russia,
that suppresses the rights of the people and keeps the citizens in
fear has much less economic success.  These oppressive
governments have ignored the fundamental purpose of government;
they are not pursuing the interests of the individual citizen
but instead are exploiting these people to further their own
cause and interests.  Government should be for the people and
should emphasize and protect human and property rights.  The
individual is best able to make decisions concerning his self,
so leave the decisions to the individuals, and hold them fully
responsible for their decisions.  As more and more governments
become primarily concerned with the well being of the
individuals a greater degree of world peace will be achieved.
All this simply because more people would have to respect the
rights of others.  Governments, however, can only do so much to
further the cause of freedom.

The individuals of all societies must pursue the path of
freedom, whether they are garbage collectors, business
executives or the political leader.  Otherwise we will never
fully achieve world peace.  There can be no global peace until
we all think of the globe as an entire society.  There has to
be a focus on the whole.  This is highly possible and is
actually occurring at a rapid pace, thanks to industry.  As I
mentioned, governments can only do so much; well, the private
sector can do a lot and has.  The international market for goods
and services is unifying the globe as well as increasing the
standard of living across the world.  Through the ventures of
international businesses countries have united to better their
own positions; just as individuals came together to form the
first society.  The international market has provided a link
among all those countries that chose to participate.  The
expansion of industries, however, should not go unchecked; it
is vitally important that these firms be held responsible to an
international authority concerned with guaranteeing the human
rights and property rights of all equally.  Without such, these
firms would be able to exploit the ignorant and oppressed.  We
would be left with situations similar to Algeria’s, as
described by Fanon:  The natives were naive to the ways of the
West when the settlers came, and the settlers came believing
the Algerian natives to be almost subhuman and not deserving of
the rights recognized in western societies.  Had their rights
been respected they would have been able to negotiate with the
settlers to reach a deal that would benefit both parties.  This
would only work if the rights of the people within the country
were protected.  When these conditions are not met the natives
might be limited to revolting in order to regain their
freedoms.  In such cases violence may be the only means to get
the ball rolling towards freedom and world peace.
Lasting peace can only exist where individuals respect
Each other’s rights and compete not with their might but with
their minds.

THE WRETCHED OF THE EARTH discussed the problems
that result when rights are denied and people can only compete
with one another with force.  Fanon seems to be encouraging the
protection of human and property rights but spends most of the
book complaining about the oppression, and venting his anger
against the capitalistic system that caused the unrest.  He
generalizes to conclude that capitalism is to blame whereas the
real culprits are those capitalists who behaved like
Machiavelli’s prince.  Fanon should have realized that
capitalism was Algeria’s best path towards increasing the
welfare of the people and the country, to bring the country
out of the dark ages.  Capitalism can, however, only flourish where
the rights of the people and their property are protected.  Marx
did not recognize the benefits to society of the evils attached
with private property and saw the best way to achieve this as
the abolition of private property.  He failed to acknowledge
that this was fundamental to human progress, that people use
the promise of acquiring property as motivation.  People
compete to prove to themselves but also to better their condition
with the rewards of victory.  Without the private property and
with equal pay for all there would be no real incentive to
produce above minimum subsistence levels.  Machiavelli spoke
often of competition but never applied it to society as a whole
(at least not in THE PRINCE).  He was concerned with
competition, among rulers, for power.  THE PRINCE is not
concerned with the structure or fairness of societies,
but is concerned with the means and methods of achieving and
maintaining power.  The prince was only concerned with his own
rights and interests.  Plato, on the other hand, was concerned
with how to construct and maintain a peaceful and efficient

Plato’s ideal society laid the foundation upon which
capitalism developed.  Plato was the only one of these four
philosophers who described an ideal society that when injected
with a bit of reality would produce a successful free society.
Plato’s ideal society has over the years become a reality in
essence:  Capitalism as we know it today is a direct descendent
of Plato’s ideals, but with luxuries and without his population
control methods.  The fundamental principle that capitalism and
Plato’s ideals have in common is what Adam Smith described as
“the invisible hand principle:”  That the pursuit of self
interest is in the best interest of the whole society.
Societies have been founded by individuals to permit specialization
and increased production in order to increase every
participant’s standard of living.  The well being of the society
will be protected as long as the individuals of the society
continue to recognize the benefits to be gained.  Since
capitalism is a system based on the individual and his/her
desires, then the individual is most likely to remain content
with his condition.  The expansionary trends of capitalism
have, though with some negative side effects, done much to
unite a large portion of the world so far.  The nations of the
world are beginning to concentrate more on economic competition
than military, and are learning to exist peacefully with one
another.  Today those oppressive governments are initiating
actions to make themselves more competitive in the
international market.  The rulers of these countries are
motivated by their self-interests to improve the economic
position of their country and in so doing are necessarily
increasing the well being of the citizens.  This process has
been progressing throughout history and will continue to at an
increasing rate as more people become educated about and demand
the benefits of a society designed primarily to increase their
own freedom and well being.  A society whose success demands
the respect of other’s rights and property.  The beauty of
capitalism lies in this fact but also in the fact that it works
for societies of all sizes and that we can achieve world peace
through the peaceful pursuit of our self-interest.

                                    * * *

{Today we have tens years at least to look at both Clintons for “Federalism” or “anti-Federalism” globalism that may be easier at times to discuss initially to a “less American” than as a “less Federalist”  - we have the Bush years more of a very consistent global standard operating method where “Constitutional” as per a fit or belief in “Federalism” or “anti-Federalism” was quite consistent, unlike, still, the Clintons, both Clintons and their old and new global initiatives private and/or public.  We have that we may find that such a discussion that may need ten years is what we need as a country in order to repair ourselves to our histories of anti-Federalism early by at least one Clinton.}

[Hmmm — that was interesting - I guess I have been writing longer columns than I thought or shorter college papers - when double spacing requirement from college now reformatted I became aware it might not even be three times the length of most of my columns.]

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 3:14 pm

“Another purpose that The Federalist was supposed to serve was as a
debater’s handbook during the ratification controversy, and indeed
advocates for the Constitution in the conventions in New York and
Virginia used the essays for precisely that purpose.”*

“Meet Ross Perot”**

Inter: Mr. Perot it is pleasure to have you with us today.  To begin please tell us about yourself.

Perot: Thank you; it is a pleasure to be here.  Let me start by saying that “ to know me is to love me.”   Beyond that you should read the book; it is all spelled out in the book.  Ooh!  Isn’t this wonderful!

Inter: Mr. Perot which book?  Do you mean “Irreconcilable Differences: or your recent book?

Perot: That is for the voters to decide - my recent book is an economic plan - I’ll do what they tell me to do.

Inter: Mr. Perot may I repeat my question?

Perot: Golly sure you can.

Inter: Mr. Perot would you tell me about yourself?

Perot: As I said “to know me is to love me.”  Apart from that the voters must decide.  I just wish politicians would listen to the American people.  The people can decide what is good for the country.

Inter: Mr. Perot who are you?

Perot:   That is for the American people to decide - “ to know me is to love me.”

Inter: Mr. Perot, please, how do you propose that we get to know you?

Perot: Well as I said we will have to wait to hear what the American people think I should do.

Inter: You didn’t answer my question about how we, as American voters, can get to know you.

Perot: Now, now, that is just the tone for which I do not care and to which I will not respond.  I do not believe there should be any negative personal discussions in a Presidential campaign.  Just listen to the American People.  “To know me is to love me.”

Inter: (SIGH!)  Why did you leave your last job Mr. Perot?

Perot:   The American people told me to.

Inter: How did they do that?

Perot: I appeared on the King Live Show and said I would run for President if the American people put me on the ballot in all fifty states.  They telephoned, wrote and faxed me to tell me to run.

Inter: So it was on a whim that you left your last job?

Perot: NO!  It was because the American people asked me to save - I mean - to run for President.

Inter: How unconventional!  Does that then mean that if you did become President and your popularity dropped, hypothetically of course, which could mean that we the American people did not want you, would you then abdicate - rather - move out of the White House?

Perot: As a Hypothetical question I don’t think it would be appropriate to respond.  And further I have already explained who I am.

Inter: (SIGH!)  Moving on - Let me ask you what excites you about your current work?

Perot: American democracy, isn’t it wonderful!  Over five million Americans think I should be President.

Inter: Why do you suppose they want you?

Perot: To know - well - to know me - ahh - they, the system is not working; we need change - Americans know how to accept sacrifice.  We must get rid of the deficit.

Inter: How do you propose to do that?

Perot: My best seller book, a best seller for weeks now, will explain what to do about the deficit; and further, the American people will decide.

Inter: How will the American people let you know?

Perot: Well that is the beauty of my Town Hall idea.  Some areas are more sophisticated than others yet we should still be able to hear by phone, fax, mail or the pony express.

Inter: I am glad you mentioned your Town Hall idea, I have been meaning to ask you something:  Are you proposing the abolishment of our democratically elected Congress in favor of a system in which a President would wait for the American people to call him/her with marching orders?

Perot:   Let me start by recognizing that you are on a deadline and I also have to be going now, and before I leave let me just add that the American voters can decide what is good for the country.  “ To know me is to love me.”


Perot managed to get elected and now the shareholders (we the people) of our diverse and not so simple country, having foregone our Congress for the honorable Perot, are meeting privately with former GM executives to learn how best to remove Perot.  We are trying to find the buy-out option Perot said he could have.  We realized too late that we already had a town hall system with our levels and branches of government, and that had we only participated more with our elected representatives we could, by staying on top of the issues, have made our representative system work smoothly.  Our apathy has been duly represented.

*{from:  Wikipedia article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_Papers}

**{written by J. P. Hogan
                 John Peter Hogan
                 September 29, 1992

Sent to Clinton/Gore people prior to Gore vs Perot debate to show attitudes, words and phrases Al Gore could use to appear as responsive as presented in this fictional script.  It was written and sent to Clinton/Gore after thinking Senator Al Gore may be worried about upcoming debate - his debate performance did seem much to stay within the lines, as I recall.} 

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 12:47 pm

*Like: Queen’s Bishop to King’s Knight’s 4 — you are a pawn?

*So if you search “Stockholm” on this site you get to:  2012us.jphogan.org/index.php?s=stockholm

*If you heard Bob Dole’s recent commentary about Newt Gingrich and the modern Republican Party there may be two Newts to consider >> Newt of from 1994 where his way as if the only way may have been about the only way for America then to keep so many new stuff moving together at once - and while most people were not aware so much was still quietly in development, and, then the later Newt that started falling to what could be call weaknesses as hoped by Clintons as the worked to either coop him or corrupt him to an inseparable lower sameness.

*I don’t know about you but I don’t see how I will be able to respect any Republican in Washington already of office holding needing swearing if they haven’t soon responded to President Obama’s school yard games and challenges, their perview, like:

J Peter Hogan
J Peter Hogan
GOP field has established that they are not suggesting that Obama lesser of
two evils - now established > school yard chaos - Obama’s challenge:
Obama has called GOP to a duty and charge to prosecute at least one in
his administration - this could be at least Hillary but by now seems to
if so also necessarily be to co-defense with Obama. “All Bush’s Fault”
if GOP didn’t have someone at least as good would stand as a trap - with just one clearly better to offer it stands as a challenge to our jurisprudence and general morals as a specific challenge to Republicans and as a challenge and a duty to now commence a response of a challenge with a real and equally vast prosecution?
Obama’s challenge stands and now can be answered well and timely as
other options are clearly available to him and such unconscionable

*We have that President Obama’s “socialism” has failed because he didn’t offer us an argument to explain how as so of “global citizen” goal claim we were to understand how important it would be for Russia, or himself to explain a “redistribution” modeling for at least Moscow - The Moscow of reputation for being home to the most number of billonaires of any city in the known world.

*We have that President Obama already has “WHY OBAMA IS FAILING” somewhere in my blogs that I will find and link shortly, and that Greeks are partly covered with Obama as linked here:  Instruction:  type: SWADDLED TOGAS in search pane on this page - then scroll down through this column now also searchable by such key words for difficult to hyperlink poem.  You can try “copy” then “paste” to browser URL window with:  2012us.jphogan.org/index.php?s=swaddled+togas

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 12:24 pm

Good Morning underwater America!

As we rise this Saturday morning, all, we have the “most distinguished gathering” that is World Economic Forum at Davos over and under considering.  Our “cup of Joe” to pour out as may be available less than needed and/or desired might best be liberal art.

To pour yourself the right fix this morning to re-tune your American “global we” as still your portion from our melted pot and not to over-flowing you might be best to shake and stir yourselves and maybe with a Constitutional stretch first.

Some mental stretching before you drink from republican trough or challis this morning is best to liberal right.  Please don’t over stir this as if I have written “leftist rights”.  Our Republic and Republicans do also support the arts and our liberal arts defend a space and time continuum where a queuing air kept to our presumption of innocence.

I have been, myself to using the new frontier of new media to view in my own time the erudition and/or rants philosophical or hopeful of the analysis streamable from Davos “most distinguished gathering.”

That said:  WAKE UP!  —  It is now necessary to artfully consider that if “Hillary” can be called a “global rock star” this may be inseparable and metaphorical as if similar to her being a global black hole of anti-Constitutional matter and near treasonous in a global we to her self and our American we. 

With your cup of republican Joe this morning you should try to be also a defender of our bulwarks in attitude and latitude of our threatened air of presumption of innocence so long dependent on our liberal art - and artistry.  Our Republican field in the anti-Clinton is our great new American HOPE — there is liberal artistry about all four of such current field to their continuum and dedication to continuation of our dependence on our “innocent until proven guilty.”

That said:  WAKE UP!  —  You might have heard about small or community banks failing as again and argument to a reset for huge and global big (POTTER) banks - and yet how now so and so read as red about the world and local communities it likely has to be still defensible (thanks to liberal art defense of presumption for all to an innocent until proven otherwise) as the special banking condition as of a collateral damage instigated and fronted by big banks - and specifically one or more Clintons and their global dreaming with big banking “friends.”

With your pouring of this morning to a reset in liberal arts we should consider that America still has a strong future ahead of it but one that is best to see and expose the line between Clintons as Americans and Clintons of grand global wanting.  To defend our presumption of innocence kept by the broad and welcoming (when working) liberal arts we may be best to consider that one or both Clintons in their globalness are being near treasonous to our Constitutionals.  They may be to something as a new global way in their we but as yet such is not supported or consecrated by our American ways, set and signed.

That said:  WAKE UP!  —  Sure this means that the three that do not win current attempt to save Republic as Republicans may some end up in episodes soon of PAN AM or DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES or MAD MAN - they may as well show up general still dedicated to Welfare of our preamble with TOUCH.  We have that leftist art has been inadequate of too global and that the Obama administration has used it at times hopeful to a protection from an admitted guilt (at least for the Clintons) to start with since inauguration and with a moral wrongness to use or abuse of our liberal art bulwarks to a presumption of guilt upon Republicans and specifically President George W. Bush so to try to create the necessary false sense of innocence for one or both Clintons and those accomplices to their negligence or willful lapses.

What I haven’t heard yet from DAVOS is the needed and overdue deeper debate and probing of the Clintons globalness and now complicity of Obama as accomplice as it pertains to violations of due process.  I have yet to hear the critical and artistic debate that could restore a continuum for a liberal right - as restored American rite - from DAVOS broadcasts that we are now on a good path back to with the depth and character of all four of Republican right still standing.

How’s that cup of Joe?  Tough to swallow with all the faulting of the left now poured out in its extra to anti Constitutionality?

Good morning all Americans still fighting these wars - these battles of our right to defend our Constitutional liberal artistic rites!

That said:  WAKE UP!  —  Hillary Clinton as a global “rock star” even with her so long already being to compromises in our most dear and necessary bulwark of attitude and latitude air and structures to presumption of innocence is dangerously too global and wanting so to still be “Constitutional” in our American.

To drink from my pot o thoughts this morning is to be extra-vigilant to our due process and defense of our uber-important presumption of innocence and respectful that Republicans are still of a willful participation and co-dependence with our liberal right.  Those Republicans that do not win this primary contest are deserved and well served towards breaking new frontiers for each of them with steps and footage for all cast and fed in party with liberal art and artisans of quite a few TV sets.

As we are really to consideration that Hillary Clinton in her global we is a global anti-Constitutional black hole with the “art” of past years of Obama’s renderings being to an unearned and undeserved still disruption of our presumptions with the worked bias of unreasonable absolutes to suggest and full innocence for Clintons that is impossible and to an falsely established guilt for President Bush.  We do have their artistry - those of left liberalisms now too global and unconsecrated by our secured rights and in their global we to a near treasonous propositioning in CRISIS!!! - excusing.


Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 6:46 pm

Hmmm?  To the moon?

An interesting reread?  >>> 

‎(REPEAT) > SHARE WHAT? - YOU CRAZY MAN! < here via linking again using search window and key word search at http://citizenrosebud.org/

Michael Gerson in an opinion piece today in THE WASHINGTON POST speaks “Citizens can lose the sense of belonging to a shared national
enterprise.” Today you all may be asking: But what about the Greeks?He
may be in a position to write about this all more objectively than
myself - I don’t know that…

Hmmm?  To the moon?

Obama’s recent upswing in polling has more than a silver lining for Mitt Romney - may get tricky to wear >> President Obama since SOTU has been cleverly not running “against” but “as” a Mitt Romney >>> but how now for Mitt Romney to run against such - to run against himself so represented? 

How now for Mitt Romney to run against a popular and populistized him while actually of the experience to carry himself off - and yet now while positioned to have to be the bad Mitt Romney - the one with the actual experience to say the other Mitt Romney is all lies?

Hmmm?  To the moon?

Aliens are coming!  Aliens are coming!  Aliens might be coming, soon! 

Aliens might be coming and if they do as “friendlies” won’t the first stop at our moon to judge us?

As aliens are coming, may be coming soon - if we are not caring for our moon will they respect us or care about us?


Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 2:09 am
(Repeat)  Searched for an old column by with “fiction as non-fiction” found this - good time to repeat it, and yet it isn’t the one I am looking about that goes to “victim hood” as struggles mine, from the Clintons’ misappropriations led to me having to live my fiction work as if it non-fiction and they could help me with it in unsolicited ways and make me have to write new fictions and so do twice the work to cover the mess they were making helping me without request/solicitation and then making me work twice as hard and just to protect my fictions not non-fictions or autobiographical but carefully considered marketing strategizing using “fiction.”  >>

Filed under: POLITICS  08/23/11
Posted by: JP HOGAN 

OOh, but where to start?

We could get silly and suggest on to of an earlier punditry that she is of President Obama’  “Oedipal” complexity and necessary as a surrogate “mom.”

But really, today, we seem most of “SOCIALISM” - the GOOD Socialists and the LESSER Socialists.

How can she be a GOOD Socialist for  Americans if her other half - the other one in their “two-fer”  complexity so of alterations to one union of two halves as instead a pragmatic political “two-fer” of two ones - is a half or other one running a Clinton Global Initiative outside of her state socialism and
obedience to her leader?

We could suggest this isn’t feminism of any reasonable or rational modern American but more a clearly arguable case of a political nepotism.  It could be an advancement more often of case considerations around sexual harassment or sexual favors
for advancement - well if we only knew if she was half of a one or
otherwise just one of a two.  As per “Bill’s” foreign policy and
experience and her’s - who slept with whom to get it — can they really both be qualified yet both not be term limited?

Oh, but where to start - how can I keep it “summer lite”?

A GOOD and obedient czar of President Obama’s administration, an also “socialist”, must be to an expectation to some global balancing and judging of other state socialists - clearly Americans were ready to have a “socialism” if actually necessary only if one that redistributed from wealth of other nations extreme wealthy into our dire labor and common needs at least as much?

Since Clintons’ Global Initiative has been allowed to co-exist as either a half again or just a one of two separable in a contractual inseparable of an air and agreement of vows to let “no one set asunder” then one or the either is necessarily a LESSER socialist — Must it be the administration (not intimate?) around their “two-fer” - the Obama administering?

With former President William Jefferson Clinton of such transition expense requests “for life” (life after small office holding of our Presidency?) so extent to GLOBAL INITIATIVES and coy financing that is at least of the story of his original requests for NYC office rentals in the Carnegie Hall Tower building next door to Tiffany’s and THE RUSSIAN TEA ROOM, if my memory serves me correctly, then we may have the obvious one not the LESSER of two so entwined but supposedly not in at least a CLINTON AUTOCRACY INITIATIVE, maybe?  We certainly have that original NYC real  estate rental story of asking for each year “for life” a rental that alone in just the first year was a rental sum greater, reportedly, than all past
Presidents combined.

Oh, but where do we start?  How did that get by Senate ethics just during campaigning pretense that may just have been actual political nepotism for former First Lady Hillary Clinton, a carpetbagger to New York State and New York City?

So we now essentially have either a GOOD socialist and a LESSER socialist both in the Clintons’ “two-fer” that oddly isn’t supposed to be any longer a celebration as two grand halves united as a hopefully glorious one.  But how do we now actually judge the Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama with Clintons both being ones that seem to lay claim to being world top Diplomat? 

Oh, where is the humanity?

Could it as well be a confused socialism of “Hillary” a replacement or surrogate socialist to replace President Obama’s mom?  Is it yet actually compromise even in more ways with two in National Security concern mixed up in an Oedipal?

I know it is a little late for us to be starting on this -  But where do we start?

How are they GOOD socialists - the odd lot that is troika of sorts, inseparable, by our laws and ethics - if we are not at least discussing that we of America and it Powers of “We the People” are not actual LESSER socialists now better to wait at least until one of these three (or is it two?) show us that uberwealthy around the world are contributing their fair share to our inequalities?

I know, it is a little late to start.  I tried.  I tried when I was encouraging a focusing around a general woe and Ford with common “beg all ah”-ishness so set around villes and cars for all or those that could afford such about car villes - they weren’t supposed to take it here - take my marketing fictions and non-fiction anywhere near here though all of a focusing once necessary to carry the day(s) for better jurisprudence and fairness and positive change for all that goes back to be of a humor one day of heading off as a guest to an exclusive club with the daughter of one member and suggesting I would park my blue collar 1988 Ford F-250 4×4 Pick-up truck on its front lawn and with a big sign with his last name anchored in its bed. 

It may not be too late to save America yet - I hope not, they weren’t supposed to interpret my marketing fictions anywhere near like they have, not even as such daughter still had a Greenberg as competition (a standard at least for her to be as good or better than) for my heart even while thinking such club dinner would seal the deal for her. 

God life is complicated - but YIKES!!!  Hillary is really COMPROMISED isn’t she?

Oh, Harris Wofford where have you gone too - do you remember the early days then against Thornburgh with Begalla and Carville and maybe Greenberg also on your side?  Did you know that President Nixon of Saddle River New Jersey likely was a member of above mentioned club, even then - and that I still was more a Republican nationally and a Democrat locally?  Oh, and that it seems
some members of Hearst family also members then, at least, while I there as invited by a friend of my sisters I had previously thought more a DC American “Cinderella” story for having been renting on the poorer side of F Street NE? 

She wasn’t supposed to be a member of such associating as I was intentionally working hard to avoid such company for more years than such surprised discovery any longer allowed.  Ours days to be two or one by then on a necessary wane - Amy and I were part of something far larger best not of further proceeding even as separable as “inseparable” of Clintons either each a half of one or a
one of two and back when I was realizing America needed more pieces on the board of our global and domestic politic and that remembered Clintons could play a dispensable temporary role, for maybe actual national security purposes.

Well maybe we all know better now - but YIKES!!!  Hillary really is COMPROMISED and of a political nepotism than most have avoided considering or judging or attempting to consider or understand.

How did I do on “summer lite”?  I tried to be a rising tide that lifted a whole lot of boats - but did even then think it best that known Clintons stay more unknown and so temporary as to be like disposable political pieces.  I think but for all this LESSER new socialism much of hours, days and years spent working to positive change and more equal rights more equally and globally, as a writer/marketer, have left a lot improved for many - more if Clintons hadn’t found ways to stay around and work to make much of it work for fewer and work more selfishly just for them.

As you may have gathered by now times in the 1990s were far more dangerous and complicated than the Clintons were addressing and maybe for they were compromised already trying to prioritize a rise of the other half (other one?) above concerns expected by Americans with oath of office swearing.  Is she “compromised” even
for a plotting near political nepotism that was seemingly a real
distraction and dominant focus of the Clintons’ 8 in our 1990s?

But how can they all be “socialists” if their isn’t actually a bureaucratic hierarchy with “Bill” still dominant and globally, at least on top?  Is President Obama actually a LESSER socialist of two more than a one way?

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 1:06 am

Imagine for a moment that you are a fool and realize it.

Were you taken in by Democrats tear jerking politics often and regularly
crass and inappropriate with each parading of individual citizen peoples
and their most personal and trying medical stories/histories?

Did Newt Gingrich support “Hillary for President” over Republican ticket
with McCain/Palin?  Is it suggestive from his recent interview with Sean
Hannity and his confession of thinking Hillary would win that he had
rolled over and rolled Republicans over with him early, and then often?

It may be hard to adequately or full asses your predicament since Speaker
Newt Gingrich for all his promise may have been too much of the nineties
when our politicians in Washington lead in a seductiveness by Clintons
seemed to think Washington, their Washington finally had technology
sufficient to them, to them as our government, in their/own own time
with media/medium to fool all of the people all of the time.

If you have missed it all along:  Newt Gingrich has admitted that he was
one of past “top Republicans” of early thinking supportive of thinking
that Hillary Clinton would be our next President.  If you have missed so
much that once, before so much tech was available to be near to
capacity to fool not just some of the people some of the time but
actually thence already to an arrogance about Washington leaders that
they then already seemed to have the tools to fool all of the people all
of the time.

Should we believe that “candidate” Gingrich has been born again and released
from past “bipartisan” underhandedness when old problems of “educating”
voters seemed surmountable?  Yes, it is complicated that we now have
even our entire Senate of days of confirming Senator Hillary Rodham
Clinton as President Barack Hussein Obama nominee for Department of
State secretarial duties, to only be getting to due comparisons and
discussions about a “political nepotism” inherent and rooted in the
story of First Lady Clinton being waved into Senator Daniel Patrick
Moynihan step on hierarchical national Democratic Party structure with
its more limited office with a minor state role as just one of two state
Senators from New York!

To consider dangers from being fooled or worked around - a discussion of an unfairness about nepotism is often called for.

To let your national leaders be of a tear jerking political grandstanding
inappropriate, as mentioned, and crass so about treating individual
personal citizen peoples’ private medical history is DANGEROUS.

Did Newt Gingrich give up the Republican fight early - so early that he
wasn’t fully with his own party and its candidates even before most
junior and inexperienced peer in our Senate to other most junior and
also inexperienced Senator Hillary were still embroiled in party
struggles and contests about a primary chase?  Did Speaker Gingrich go
over to the dangers and darkness of the other side mostly during the
reign of the Clinton 8 and maybe now have gotten back but not before
having still been to of the other that he rolled over early for Hillary
and Bill to get back their White House?

It is inappropriate for their to be a national institutionalization about
healthcare for the classes of working age able Americans, and while,
again, it seems crass that our national leaders can parade tear jerking
politics with personal and private medical histories.  To have a
national government skip over so many local and community possibilities
and yet tried alternatives to rush madly to a mass objectifying with
each citizen person necessarily now more just a number and of a State
metric is to also kill God and Heaven benefits - it is to move us to a
national daily think as “numbers” and a categorized and boxed metric
such that past of being stirred by song and sermons can no longer parade

There may be a clear progression of “Newt” from days addicted and
seduced/corrupted by Clintons to the “candidate” now out and about
speaking of lessons learned and new opinions reached with new policies
to offer.

There is a clear problem if a nationalization of an insuring of those of
working age able bodies masses become fodder for politicians now still
able to turn numbers and metrics for contrary good with tear jerk

There is a problem that a nationalization so beyond being UnConstitutional is
contrary to original march and purpose and general good practices
spiritual and sermonized around days of our founding and federalism
struggles - there is that we will be expect to wake and walk each day
more concerned with ourself as of a national numerical objectivity in a
set category boxed so in the metric of the day, political by new design,
and no longer able to see community as otherwise and original once of
people of souls and trials daily in God’s work to save their own souls
and live to a purity of soul with community not as an objective number
but as an equal soul with equal chance of saving or grace toward Heaven.

We can’t be both and stay objective with foreign entanglements if
government of “official” “caring” - we will either be of Congress in a
positive establishment of religion or a negative establishment of
religion - their either will be a God or and establishment that there is
not a God and Congress so must take over all “saving” and

Obamacare does reach beyond a “commerce” of Medicare and Medicaid that was of an economic concern about forgotten or ignored children or elderly and from
days we didn’t have the technology to protect one community doing good
from another working to force its burdens to be mobile and to move out
of their community to benefit as fairly as those in the community that
was trying to lead in a good doing.  We have moved passed these old days
and even such conundrums that could be said to have necessitated for
“commerce” a nationalization of and “entitlement” for what was largely
masses of forgotten elderly and children.

Maybe you know the real “Newt” - maybe you haven’t even yet questioned how
much past supportiveness of Clintons has him compromised and
historically as in the wrong retrospectively.  Maybe, he is exempt from
problems of “Hillary” and New York Senate seat arrangement from the
Clinton White House and our Senators that didn’t air and haven’t yet
processed that the deals for New Yorkers with the offering of First Lady
Hillary Clinton is inseparable from a “nepotism” tag - from a
“political nepotism” tagging.

And so now, again about you:  We have that Newt Gingrich did basically roll
over for Hillary early and so with such a problem for it seems a
silence from him would have been better for his party and national
security.  We have that “Newt” may have had more fight in him for
President Bush - or that he didn’t as now “concerning” and evidence of
inadequate “judgement” or insufficient global “strategic” thinking.  We,
have that he may have Republican ghosts now for having been of the
Clintons’ 8 too much and when such was an era for our Washington
politicians seemingly for a new think that they now had the tools not to
just fool some but to actually fool most or all of the people all or
most of the time.

Just imagine,  just imagine for a moment if you can.  And if relevant to
your think that as a national boxed “number” your soul and goodness will
be undermined - that a community organizing to “God’s work” will be
legislated and so that instead of seeing neighbors as neighbors equally
to opportunity to goodness you will see worry and national wonder of
them more as a national “number.”

Just imagine,  just imagine for a moment if you can.  And really protest! 
Really protest for it still seems inappropriate that our State’s
national or Federal Congress is allowed to parade tear jerking personal
and private medical stories as part of their politics/politicing

I mean you have remembered that arrangements were made hierarchically from Clinton White House and I believe in Clintons’ White House with New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan such that all First Lady Clinton would need to do to effect the
organized political nepotism would be to be escorted around New York state a few times with the full luxury and protection and pomp and
circumstance that the full Secret Service detail and amenities had for
term limited Presidential protection and ceremonial traditions, right?

Right?  Just imagine if you hadn’t just imagined (anew)!  If you believe in
Democrat Party ideology to nationalization and of socialism hierarchical
leadership by a few and a limited “chosen” then it is unavoidable to
see that First Lady Hillary Clinton only became a New York Senator by
arrangement and an specific effecting traditionally considerable as
“political nepotism”!

Comments Off
1984ish STILL
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 12:43 am

What follows has been copy and pasted from my updates as to status via Facebook.com/jpeterhogan account today:

Quite simply the global economy can be said to have become too corrupt with
each effort of the Clintons to reign for forty years or nearly.
Every one of our Governors but maybe Vermont’s would be now better for our
and worlds economy than Secretary Clinton and better now or as next if
actually us of a Secretary of State from rolls of our current Governors.
They have to be just as international and even more market and
economically focused, don’t they now?

Has anyone yet calculated the number of jobs I created? I have no idea but
do remember being a godfather to modern snowboard and half pipe since
pal & I got giddy brainstorming such before the fact on a New Haven -
Hamden hill almost a natural half pipe - and well as well my
godfathering of American handsaw reinvention by Stanley Tools to blend
the best of my English and Japanese hand saws regularly
then both used and then as well to be very brief also all that grew
with Harry Potter mused challenge and decade plus of support? I may
have generated over a 120,000 jobs just for Hollywood types separate
from above, too - but has anyone calculated such and as the price we are
paying for Clintons’ attempt to reign as near forty years as they can -
I do apologize still for making them more electable than they were but
not for their shortcomings since election in 1992 - they didn’t
collaborate the tried to reign as sold not as they were better to be
exposed as more so and really so.

J Peter Hogan
There is also I took a likely to a depressed classmate about our fifth
reunion at Villanova for his business idea of “Life is good” even though
by his telling he and his brother were ready after three years only
with a few products and their van were
ready to give up. I did speak from my confidence about economic
recovery then in early 90s even though still of the recession that the
recession was basically over and he should stick it out a little longer.
I liked that such as also of Villanova might help me remember my years
helping guide politics and business and media types to a faster
recovery. I did plug his brand after meeting him to most in my network.
I still don’t know that I own a single item from their business but
did tell him then if he had a frisbee in his product line I would have
bought one if fit for Ultimate.

J Peter Hogan
But as per IBM what ideas shared casually with its CFO back whence about
middlemen less necessary around blue jean entrepreurs may mean such
thought that preceded the new turn to lay offs may be to a reduction of
“jobs created” math except where new
competitiveness was kept and not all sold off. I did canvass while near
a year about streets of Connecticut through winter months much more
than a few early retired from IBM - I was a citizen organizer of
canvasses for cleaner air and healthcare reform with ConnPIRG and CCAG -
and from such to a greater confidence that our counties were better
venue for reform and that Canadian system wrong for us and especially

J Peter Hogan
With the mention of years of hard labor in this is that such was of my need
to be capable & effectively of a repeat and also that I had to be
able to refresh my original works and strategies anew so that I while of
a repeat could also, daily if needed, be to showing in writing that I
understood Clintons’ strategies better than they - as should be expected
of one that cries foul with like of this:

It may help to consider that because of the Clintons I have been since
1992 quite as if paying more than 100% in taxes as their use of my
intellectual property and its well worked rhyme and reason after once
sworn in was not authorized or proper and did keep me with my very vast
and complex marketing integration and coordination as I had planned it
and set it up without the ability to be me in the character and
propriety I needed to get acknowledged and compensated from. They kept
me by playing as if me and then abusing me further when they
triangulated around me as to a “get back to the center” as they again
yet spun out from getting paid or acknowledged as me and more critically
so to keeping the public from the planned knowing I needed to rework
most of such economic and marketing integration so that it could stick
and last. Yes the Clintons have had me protesting near two decades that
they thought my private initiative and skill and integrations could be
treated as a public good of a like autocratic authority theirs to use
and use as they did so showing an inadequate understanding and skill as.
This is that 100% where all the earnings I expected were prevented
because they assumed an improper and unauthorized use, and then to
unintended or planned shorter term economic life for much of such
efforts actually meant and expected to be of a greater public good while
I could get paid than their misuse of such has ever been. So if of such
as a 100% tax it is so for it kept me near from 100% of earnings and
then had me doing hard labors as best way I had left to preserve my
intended and evident property rights so maybe more truthfully like I
have been at over a 1,000% or far greater TAXINGNESS by my country due
to Clintons improper and authorized or planned usage.

(My Facebook status updates are rebroadcasted as tweets of @jphoganorg.  In light of the above sharing it maybe helpful to consider as I do that at least the Tea Party has been reseting our country in ways I was kept from earlier and so that I now am freer to just focus on sharing useful and much involved truths more about justice and fairness than as they may have been more regularly considered a political or partisan.  This is more personal and defensive of a victim hood than a new effort - than a political effort.  We dropped and corrupted as a nation many of our standards during the Clintons’ years and especially their second term.  And, now again others now are empowered to pick up as they desire in a new democratic reset, as many already have been busy.)

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 4:29 pm


Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 10:41 pm

Where there was the surprise attack about our Pearl Harbor and economics of war has been since also calculated.  Young have stirred there about, free, regardless of race or color towards a free market capitalist mathematics, some by mostly white teachers, maybe, though.

I do not know if of all of the years of President Obama’s educating and class time if he had 99% of his teachers and professors of the caucasian provenance while passing as a dark native, and of many years more of an apparent majority.  To refresh some of our leaders rearing is to go back and relearn he was raised by a white mother fond of micro-loan humanitarian creative banking while coddled by a more big bank/banking grandmother, also white.

President Obama may only know white math. 

President Obama’s economics maybe be foreign to most.

We have a wonderful history of a free market capitalism within America, many surprised soldiers have already died defending its special freedoms and opportunity over much of our young country’s history.  We have for the most part avoided go to war with a free economy and returning home with a forced centralization more foreign to our legacy and ways.  We still somehow have managed not to have our armed brave of our forces and logistics teams return to their homes and communities after battling to defend justice and freedom and then be forced to turn in their pride for State plowshares - their pride for socialism at home.

These that long paid the high price and those all about those that paid the highest price have somehow been preserved still in the American ways of freedom and economics that made victory possible.  They didn’t go off to war as capitalists - win the contests - and then return home forced to try to understand why they now were being told they should be of the ways they had been fighting against.

Some surprising math of our melted pot of our economic legacy is some of our most recent attempts to sum up an irrational set of considerations.  We can have carrots and sticks in capitalism and still are wise to consider cause and effect and which first steps to take first, especially if the goal is cost savings - necessary new efficiencies.

I cannot explain the idealism or misplaced optimism of President Barack Obama of Hawaii, he may have grown up mostly educated by whites and while treated quite as if he was a native and of the majority.  As he took his first President economic steps those of Davos may have been a wondering - as he took his first steps where sticks were better he offered carrots.  Our problems for post swearing Presidency commenced in 2009 were to necessary cost savings and much about a concern for our borders.  It still is up-side down economic math and practice that he walked and talked healthcare for all before border and immigration reformations and JOBS strategizing.

It all seemed for a minority a convenient set of crisi perfectly timed to usher a new nationalism or even grand socialism - if not even more obvious domestic economic conversion to a system full of special czars.  For those who were diehards for American free market economics and a continuation to “land of opportunity” it was publicly considered that healthcare carrot should have been the last offering of policy reform if cost cutting and savings searching actually the necessary calling.

It was so elementary and magical it seemed while healthcare carrots offered first while our economy and immigration issues needed a timely and stern review first that Obama Democratics thought they just had to click their heals for such to work at home.  (For now I will continue uniformed with presumption (assumption?) that until college President Obama had few African American (black) instruction.)

To save and find as much reasonable cost cutting through reforms, again, healthcare should have been last and not offered so as a carrot to complicate effectiveness or fairness for economy JOBS issues and border and immigration reforms.  A stick wasn’t necessarily needed at least as long as new grand temptations as “carrots” were hung out like a free for all.

Heights, he has reached, and racially alike as too that have clicked with black President Barack Hussein Obama.  His story of being a American black of minority status may not have started to well past puberty for him.  This may not be the first thing we should be considering, and it may need some checking and yet it is something to wonder about as Mitt Romney enough a global mover and shaker to be on par with those clicking at Davos but to President Obama - not. 

It is odd that President Obama has moved to running more as Romney than “against Romney.”  It seems that Davos to President Obama is all good and yet he walks and talks reflective of  Governor Mitt Romney yet somehow as a “bad” - a capitalist.

We have that Obama Democratics did cherish CRISIS as opportunity for radical reforms - we have that besides if to cost savings and reasonable efficiencies from economic reforms that first we as a nation should have worked really to a full immigration reformation and then to a new growth economy with maximum efforts towards new jobs.  I don’t know or understand how we move to Obamacare - well I don’t for sake of this column understand how they moved towards Obamacare so simply without first doing all the needed hard work and politics then and still needed for immigration and borders and to a new American free growth economy.

It may be all the fault of his years of white mathematics though more likely since balanced through youth with a big banking grandmother and creative financier of micro-loaning legacy that this was a later in life conversion.  He has spoken greatly about influences of dreams, his dad’s dreams his.  But does Davos consider already or enough that as well as this all upside down for American free economy general Welfare body politics our Constitution is less a market consideration now than, so you might say are the Harry Potter books — what Obama Democratics attempted shouldn’t have been timed with such free market success that had embedded greatly a romanticism for old and well worn.

They have gone all glittery and clickish these past few years.  They must not have been serious about jobs or cost savings, though, considering how they ignored human nature and nurturing long teased with global marketing by dangling massive socialized “carrots” without other necessary disciplines considered.

And as I now reflect some on my decades an active beacon of economic considerations by at least some I am remembering how I have long been to thinking what “could work” wasn’t what would or should work.  I did shine that thought out unsuccessfully in earlier old battles of similar clickish Democratics economic dreamings with some welcoming an “it could work” from me though I clearly disagreed that such should be tried or would actually work.

Yes, the Clintons have made a mess.  President Obama now has been making their mess worse.  And I can remember that there were things in my shared economy thought that I still think they never should have tried to use without actually asking me to explain how there was more they should be looking at and that which they would have had to known enough to look for to ask for, and yet didn’t. 

And well, it may help even now to remember or consider that most of good economy and growth during Clintons’ first four of eight was inherited from the politics and clever marketing touch of Reagan and those of Reagan Revolution.  We have as well that these of Obama Democratics have also been contrary and inconsistent with the general free market and capitalism reset that was and is often legally discussed as the Rehnquist Revolution.

I guess if they new capitalism was working so well and with such complexity they may have worked just as long and hard to take it so far and completely apart.  We don’t though now have to see their economic “crisis” of only having their solutions as our modern options.  We still can look at Obamacare and see that it shouldn’t at least have been attempted until our border and immigration and also our economy and jobs crisi democratically addressed and reformed.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 2:32 am

A general masquerade was still in the air…  As it happens we may be due a focus now on pragmatists.  We are still of multiple crisi of valuation about the foci of elliptical.  A storm is  still about the “redistribution” usage as the focus of crisis, but not all crisi of Obama’s round about-ness.

If you are like me you may be trying to avoid just talking about 2012 State of the Union Address.  There are enough issues and of sufficient complexity in Federalism issues much of Obama’s states of emergencies.   We can, we can if we try - we can talk to issues also of “redistribution” and “fairness” without making light of President Obama.

There is a localism concern about a recent much masqueraded storm about two of America’s top wealth “neighborhoods” so counties that speak to a crisis of Obama crisi.  [I didn’t study Latin - hope I am not actually saying I blog in my underwear.]

To reset our focus now and speak to emergencies and Federal Emergency Response funds we can high light an “October Surprise” a recent masquerading Halloween Surprise snow storm.  This is seriously an issue of our crisis of valuation much afoot since Obama inaugural and before.

But did you see First Lady Michelle Obama at State of the Union adorned in volumes of hues of blues in political dress that screamed and bit with an air of:  Clintons are in an open marriage! - ?

I don’t know what to make of five - only five justices.  But if you heard of the storm that was a snowy “October Surprise” so for Connecticut that it took itself to top - the top of the list for storm damage of most number of power outages as a single event than you know it wasn’t a treat with its masquerading and more a trick.

Connecticut got a wallop reigned down upon it and across it as a snow storm back near Halloween.  Fairfield and Litchfield Counties long thought of as some of richest counties in America got served an unexpected natural expense.  They are long in part also considered rich suburbs of New York City - they are no Buffalo NY - they can afford such times.

I am trying to avoid talking about the State of the Union - but I cannot help but write about fairness and burden sharing and still the crisi of many crisis a foci about our elliptical.  There seems to have been an unfair redistribution of a nationalized “emergency” coddling for a snowy region able to pay for damages about their communities.  I haven’t checked the recent demographic reports to see if nearby Fairfield and Litchfield counties have fallen from like being the 1percent of places to live.

Beyond Federalism and governance as a ideological exercise of mental faculties we have a pragmatism about localism and as well “fairness” and “redistribution” yet of President Obama to a fast and vast “emergency” coddling.

New York staters may as well have been dealt a service interruption and called to consideration for “emergency” state - but New York is more pedestrian in some ways and places and its new Governor has a miracle to perform - a make over of he and his state.  Governor Cuomo is moving ahead focused well it seems so far towards the necessary and near complete unlearning and retraining necessary for him to move past his years as a Clinton administration expert with skill and ways not now much useful in New York.

And so about the snow job — we really have “redistribution” and “fairness” as real local and global political consideration to a new or reset governance pragmatism.  

Oh, yeh!  Michelle was the BOMB!  First Lady Michelle Obama carried hues of blues politically with bite tonight - she was the BOMB!

How can Connecticut even if it did have over 900,000 without power due to a storm that masquerade as an “October Surprise” not have been set up within counties of Fairfield and Litchfield to cover the service interruptions and tree work with a snow tax or something?  How does a snow belt provincial season expense become an expensing for our nationalize “emergency” response funds?  People of such a provincial of such counties likely have moved there or stayed there to have snow in their mix - I would think.

Why did President Obama so quickly coddle such even though a crises of his crises of valuation of his daily ponderance of Washington Monument views over the nearby ellipse?  How did he “redistribute” from have-not funds to have funds after a desirous snowy region got snow and its complications quite within its means. 

Was it wrong for Connecticut Governor to ask President Obama to redistribute unfairly federal “emergency” funds to Connecticut even though it had just been taxed to handle the most ever number of power outages across and about the state?

How did we get here?  How has global warming and alarms about inevitable addition and maybe bigger storms been here so long and yet such rich counties of Connecticut hadn’t yet adjusted their local and community balance sheets - or the state?  How did additional funds not already get appropriated and put aside for seasonal storm damage?

Was it wrong?   Is it wrong that Connecticut asked for “emergency” funds for these two counties despite that outages set a record?  Where is the “responsibility” about “fairness” or “redistribution”?  How is it “ability to pay” and with “available funds” reachable by taxes not just have Connecticut issue some type of emergency bond to then raise new local taxes to cover?  Or which ever other taxation methods might be available for issue that are related to community maintenance and upkeep?  Did these counties cheap out on providing enough tree care jobs prior to the storm and then ask others from our nation to cover that they had cut corners in their own community and not out of hardship?

Maybe the new Andrew Cuomo - Governor Cuomo - had an answer newly figured for New Yorkers.  I don’t know.

How did this happen - how did our national government become a crutch for states instead of a standard bearer?  Again, this was about snow in a region people choose to live in and about for the snow - how did this happen?

President Obama approved such a upside down redistribution and without explaining a philosophy correction.  We have that we have all been warned to expect more and maybe bigger storms of all sorts of weather as due to global warming - however caused.  We have that if such is so then our states are all due a reconsideration about “fairness” and “redistribution” as much a new federalism for our nation so that they adjust all and every one to a new normal - a new more stoic balancing less of dependency on nation as a quick financial crutch, right?

But did you notice it seemed President Obama did use the recent State of the Union to run against Mitt Romney he used it so it seemed to run as if Mitt Romney - but without the experience.   Again:  How do you get the job?  You need experience!  How do you get experience?  You need the job to get experience!  {Don’t know whom to quote or if I got the old adage quoted correctly.}  Seems President Obama is suggesting a new way forward and one that is varient from his earlier focus about our elliptical and its foci - he seems to be stating we need him to have skills yet seen - he seemed to be saying we need our nation now of expertise much of Mitt Romney’s “cups of tea.”

And REALLY!!!  All our states need a federalism reset for crisi or crises due as a/the “NEW NORMAL” as focus, now.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 11:57 am

SOTU tonight as another TRUTH-O-METER TUESDAY for us of what is left of our Country — it is hard to believe that ever before a President at Congress so is more deserved of such public exposure being treated like a perp walk.

Republicans last night nicked away at truths that the media isn’t likely to walk or talk without pressure - last night Republicans spoke enough truths and about how housing crisis got started such that Representative Darrell Issa is looking civil for his past remarks tagging the Obama administration as “the most corrupt.”

No,  we cannot expect the media to jump on board quickly to affirm the truths the Republicans shared last night and the 2012 and beyond concern so responsibly stepped about how we are at a time and crisis much of “government’s” (Democrats’ of government) causation that our fellow Americans have their government more at fault for their housing messes than themselves.

I am not here happily writing today trying to brag with an “I told you so” or “see, I was right” attitude - being right now annoys me and angers me and even depresses me some.  Last nights Republican debate broke through with some truth telling a major unearthing of truths that media has helped somehow knowingly or unknowingly bury for decades.  Enough shovels full of truth from Republican were thrown last night to expose some essential truths, much I have not been two decades about.

It is hard to wrap your hands around much of this for how much and how long efforts have been accepted and the norm towards burying them knowingly or unknowingly.  We have the likes of the Bush tax cuts as one oddity about such that easily slides back or falsely covers truths — The Bush tax cuts were of a justification not to stimulate economy and create jobs but more simply as they were as a pre 9/11 politics of a reduction in revenue justified by Clintons’ surpluses — The Clintons set it up that more taxes by Republicans weren’t necessary and tax cuts by Republicans then built on such.

We have that Speaker Pelosi long defended the Bush tax cuts maybe better than most and yet we hardly look at our history this way.  We have that Speaker Pelosi with her steadfast and constant defense of the Clintons’ surpluses was always justifying the Bush tax cuts - that she as well as Clintons were saying that the Clintons’ cuts were inviolate, and so justifying of tax cuts.  We have that Speaker Pelosi did then maybe more knowingly become more political about such without even shoveling some truths her self about how 9/11 and collateral spending since has been more an “inheritance” from the Clintons, and, the Clintons spending cuts.

We have that but for all of Secretary of State Clinton’s droning and ODYSSEY DAWN walk of a shoveling that has dirtied her hands, even stained her hands with blood, President Bush with Operation Iraqi Freedom was first to attempts to have our global fighting of monsters be compensated with State revenues from those countries once they of a Congress themselves able to be democratically about determining their own terms of reconstruction.  We have inviolate that the Clintons were lousy on sanctions and that First Lady Hillary Clinton marched around the world heeling inciting political remarks and dictates near of an imperialism and that is a near buried truth now that with such the Clintons and their budgeting and surpluses shouldn’t have been thinking PEACE and Peace Dividends while she out and about stirring anti-American angst and raising threat levels with her dictates as said near of an imperialism.

It is a revealing truth now from recent shoveling of Republicans of truths full of debate and campaign work that has this partly getting air as shovel full and shovel full that still have Hillary Clinton of stained hands bring more to the surface in even our media.

When you start to consider that the spending cuts and new revenue levels set proudly yet very politically and partisan by Clintons and as well of a corruption of Republicans then also high on new tech and dot com boom for it of toolage to allow nearer a fooling of all the people all the time:  Badda Boom! > Operation Iraqi Freedom was to letting a democratic Iraqi Congress be the deserved venue Thaddeus Stevens once fought about after our Civil War as proper for United States — We have that Iraqi people came to have a Congress of their own and such the body politic best to determine the terms of their own reconstruction.  Taken with Bush tax cuts being justified by Clintons’ surpluses and before the inheritance of the Clintons became known as it is as “9/11″ much — we have that we didn’t need the revenue it seems before 9/11 and then had the thinking of ODYSSEY DAWN about United States getting compensated for fighting of global monsters as the earlier Bush league thinking of Bush administration so that much of our debts about “war” in Iraq was to be “paid for.”

We have that Hillary Clinton is at times being successful - those few times - as if she is being more like Nixon and or more like President Bush than like the Hillary we thought we knew.   I stand by my blogged comments that she can go into the history books as near our worst Secretary of State ever - and that she deserves to first suggest whom she sees as our ten worst before her before we get to the deserved and due comparisons.

It is too early to defend the work of Republicans last night with their shovel fulls of truth unearthing that media will likely be slow to cover for it is years of their covering that is being now removed.  It is not too early to call it all very defensible - to give kudos to this work by Republicans.  They deserve awards for telling the truth and bravery - we still have whether they have enough innocence in them and fight to see it fully cleared and shared.  We have that last night Republicans started the hard work now to explaining that Democrats did cause most of this down economy and much as it has buried much complicity and corruption specific of dirty hands of both Clintons.

President Obama does deserve tonight to be greeted and hosted with hostility most allowed within decorum standards - he is deserving of as near the perp walk consideration as above discussed - he has been to attempts to say add a permanent concrete barrier over these covered truths that implicate the Clintons the most - he have been since day one of a cover-up to this effect.

No, this is not something I wanted to be right about, though long quite confident — so but, and at last:  I told you so. :-(

Yes!  Somehow President Bush was supposed to be able to create new jobs and find new revenues all the while the Clintons extra trillion rashly cut and match revenue reductions were supposed to be and stay right and inviolate.  Go figure how now (finally) that President Bush was supposed to be able to fix anything without showing that the Clintons had been wrong and dangerously wrong and not just with their surpluses.  Ask Speaker Pelosi if you must - she was the one toward 2008 that kept this preposterousness fresh and alive as a rational - though quite irrational.

Comments Off